Apiiro vs Checkmarx One comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apiiro Logo
321 views|184 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Checkmarx Logo
32,487 views|21,108 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apiiro and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Testing (AST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. Checkmarx One Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution.""Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

More Apiiro Pros →

"It has all the features we need.""The administration in Checkmarx is very good.""We use the solution for dynamic application testing.""Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application.""We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis.""The ability to track the vulnerabilities inside the code (origin and destination of weak variables or functions).""The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly.""One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."

More Checkmarx One Pros →

Cons
"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git.""User management is a little bit clunky."

More Apiiro Cons →

"It is an expensive solution.""Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation.""We can run only one project at a time.""We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives.""The validation process needs to be sped up.""We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level.""Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”.""The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

More Checkmarx One Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is the right price for quality delivery."
  • "I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."
  • "The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."
  • "The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."
  • "It is a good product but a little overpriced."
  • "The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."
  • "​Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."
  • "We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."
  • More Checkmarx One Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly.
    Top Answer:My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive.
    Top Answer:Apiiro recently integrated SaaS, and we would love to see them expand on that. They provide many integrations to different products, including SaaS products such as Snyk. Ideally, Apiiro would include… more »
    Top Answer:I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
    Top Answer:Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
    Top Answer:The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users.
    Ranking
    Views
    321
    Comparisons
    184
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,148
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    32,487
    Comparisons
    21,108
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    513
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Snyk logo
    Compared 51% of the time.
    Cycode logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Ox Security logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Semgrep Supply Chain logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 52% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Snyk logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Coverity logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)
    Learn More
    Overview

    Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

    Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

    Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

    Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

    Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

    Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.



    Checkmarx is a highly accurate and flexible static code analysis product that allows organizations to automatically scan uncompiled code and identify hundreds of security vulnerabilities in all major coding languages and software frameworks. Checkmarx is available as a standalone product and can be effectively integrated into the software development lifecycle (SDLC) to streamline vulnerability detection and remediation. Checkmarx is trusted by leading organizations such as SAP, Samsung, and Salesforce.com.

    Checkmarx is a global leader in software security solutions for modern software development. Checkmarx delivers a comprehensive software security platform that unites with DevOps by scanning uncompiled source code for security vulnerabilities early in the development life cycle to reduce and remediate risk from software vulnerabilities. Using Checkmarx, teams avoid software security vulnerabilities managed via a single and unified dashboard without slowing down their delivery schedule.

    Checkmarx balances the needs of the entire organization, delivering seamless security from the start and throughout the entire software development life cycle. Checkmarx can be deployed on-premises in a private data center or hosted via a public cloud.

    Checkmarx Features

    Some of Checkmarx’s features include:

    • Source code scanning: Detect and repair more vulnerabilities before you release your code.

    • Open-source scanning: Find and eliminate the risks in your open-source code.

    • Interactive code scanning: Scan for vulnerabilities and runtime threats.

    • Open-source security for infrastructure as code: Identify and fix insecure IaC configurations that put your application at risk.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Checkmarx stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to enable developers to secure their code with a single management dashboard and its high-speed scanning abilities.

    PeerSpot users note the effectiveness of these features. A CEO at a tech services company writes, “The most valuable features are the easy-to-understand interface, and it’s very user-friendly. We spend some time tuning to start scanning a new project, which is only a few clicks. A few simple tunes for custom rules and we can start our scan. We can do the work quickly and we don't need to compile the source code because Checkmarx does the work without compiling the project. The scanning is very quick. It's about 20,000 lines per hour, which is a good speed for scanning.”

    A director at a tech services company notes, “The features and technologies are very good. The flexibility and the roadmap have also been very good. They're at the forefront of delivering the additional capabilities that are required with cloud delivery, etc. Their ability to deliver what customers require and when they require is very important.”

    A senior manager at a manufacturing company writes, “The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

    Sample Customers
    Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan
    YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Outsourcing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise40%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apiiro vs. Checkmarx One
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apiiro is ranked 21st in Application Security Testing (AST) with 2 reviews while Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Testing (AST) with 67 reviews. Apiiro is rated 8.6, while Checkmarx One is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Apiiro writes "A great secrets detection feature, good visibility, and integrates well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". Apiiro is most compared with Snyk, Cycode, Ox Security, SonarQube and Semgrep Supply Chain, whereas Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity. See our Apiiro vs. Checkmarx One report.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors, best API Security vendors, and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.