We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics and others in Mobile APM."Whenever the application crashes from user behavior, we can easily simulate the error. We are happy with this feature and find it to be valuable."
"There are many features that are very valuable to us, but the ability to monitor the status of the users' experience in real-time is one of them."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its GUI."
"In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool identified an issue within the mobile app, causing lost transactions in the billing system."
"We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"For anybody who is looking into enhancing or improving their application code quality, I would definitely recommend this solution."
"It helps us prioritize application performance issues. It has assisted triage where we can drill down and see where exactly the problem lies."
"I found the solution's end-to-end analysis and flexibility most valuable."
"I have found Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to be scalable."
"CA APM is very scalable and used in a clustered environment because it supports more than its technical capacity."
"An application is quite complicated in the environment of a software reliability engineer, because our applications are like a black box. Thanks to CA APM we are able to transform this black box to a gray box by using the transaction trace functionality services. For me it's the most valuable service of the solution."
"Service maturity when you can retrieve the normal metrics for every major aspect of each module and delivering this info to the correct eyes."
"The most valuable feature of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is its very light model with monitoring of servers and network items."
"The configuration and the manager tool are good features."
"In terms of improvements we would like to see, we want to understand what the battery consumption metrics are whenever a user is viewing. It would be really helpful for us if we could get those details levels."
"The way the agentless monitoring and agent monitoring get used is to be decided by the user, but there is no clarification on the setup phase or on how and why to use the aforementioned options."
"There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java."
"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."
"I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now."
"I would like to see a better way to automate actions based on the events generated by the tool."
"The initial setup is complex."
"User Experience is a BIG one. Integration of all of APM components into one swift deployment."
"Needs the ability to dynamically create dashboards. Right now, we do custom dashboards. Everything is created manually."
"Dashboards need to be improved in order to make them self-explanatory."
"The upgrade was complex. The documentation could have been a little bit better, but other than that, it was okay."
"They need to add support for new frameworks, or at least provide a broader guide/perspectives to add them to monitoring specific agents to retrieve metrics with thresholds as a reference to guide the customer as to where they must go to achieve this."
"With respect to SQL monitoring, it would be nice to have a little more information because it doesn't provide the full statement all of the time."
"There is no auto flow diagram, and the alert mechanism is not as good when compared to other tools."
More AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is ranked 5th in Mobile APM with 6 reviews while Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews. AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2, while Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring writes "Offers insights into peak usage hours, the application's status, and that of secondary services, such as databases and APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is most compared with , whereas Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and New Relic.
We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.