We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."AppDynamics' best feature is automation - for example, when I add a note, it can understand the data automatically."
"It reduces the time to resolve issues and requires less manpower."
"The best feature of AppDynamics is the analytics, which gives us the business insights of the application."
"The most valuable feature is having our services being available and healthy."
"The features that I like best are the dashboard and Business Journey."
"It provides everything into one view, so we can track information from one place to another."
"Capacity planning is, in my opinion, the most useful."
"The SAP monitoring element is very helpful."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"There are too many installers available for this solution."
"The integration part in AppDynamics with other systems is an area with a little difficulty, especially when it comes to the configuration area. The integration of AppDynamics with other products takes a lot of time."
"We have had downtime, which has been the result of config, application, or cord issues."
"I would like to see more of a unified platform. They're very, very new on the server side, machine agents. I want them to be more mature in this area."
"One area for improvement is the MST model. It would be more helpful if it could be offered as a managed service provider model with more multi-tenancy and features."
"It needs strengthening in the database tiers."
"The solution could improve by covering more technologies. For example, it does support .NET Core applications. However, it could be a bit better."
"The network diagnostics that they are adding will be really useful. They could add more detail into what is going on in the network."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 153 reviews while TruView is ranked 54th in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.