We performed a comparison between ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The tool's architecture is thin and scalable. We also like the product's ease of deployment. My company is also impressed with the solution's number of connectors."
"It is a scalable product."
"Performance-wise, it is excellent."
"I found it valuable that CyberArk Privileged Access Manager can be integrated with PTA (privileged threat analytics), and this means that it will tell you if there's a risk to the logins and signs of risk and if risky behavior is observed. It's a good feature. Another good feature is the CPM (central password manager) because it helps you rotate the passwords automatically without involving the admins. It can go and update the scheduled tasks and the services. At the same time, if there's an application where it cannot do all of these, CPM will trigger an automatic email to the application owners, telling them that they should go ahead and change the password. This allows you to manage the account password that CyberArk cannot manage, which helps mitigate the risk of old passwords, where the password gets compromised, and also allows you to manage the security of the domain."
"The voice technology is very good."
"The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out."
"It's secure and reliable. I especially appreciate that it's locked down and only allows access to authorized components."
"Because we now have the ability to grant access to management utilities like DNS Manager, Sequel Studio, and MMC, in a secure fashion, without system admins being required to continually reenter various passwords that are stored who knows where, it has really made the system admin's job much easier. It has made the PSM's job much easier. It has made the auditor's job and the security team's job and the access manager's job significantly easier, because we're able to move much more quickly toward a role-based access management system, and that is really streamlining the whole onboarding/offboarding management process."
"I love the ability to customize the passwords: the forbidden characters, the length of the password, the number of capital, lowercase, and special characters. You can customize the password so that it tailor fits, for example, mainframes that can't have more than eight characters. You can say, "I want a random password that doesn't have these special characters, but it is exactly eight characters," so that it doesn't throw errors."
"The tool needs to improve its pricing."
"They need to provide better training for the System Integrator."
"The initial setup was somewhat complex."
"The support services could act faster when people reach out to resolve issues."
"Initially, there was a lot of hiccups, because there were a lot of transitions due to manual installations."
"Some aspects of the administration need improvement, though they have recently made improvements to the API. However, the management with the interface and configuration are not so user-friendly. It has not changed much during all the years that CyberArk has been on the market. The management part, like platform management as well as PSM connectors definition and management, could be improved, even if it has already been done with the API."
"Its pricing is a big challenge here. When it started, the product came in at a very low cost. Now, they are the leaders in the market, so the cost has grown and is quite huge."
"There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar."
"The Vault's disaster recovery features need improvement."
More ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS Pricing and Cost Advice →
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS is ranked 15th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews. ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS is rated 10.0, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS writes "Helps to manage human, digital and machine identities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS is most compared with , whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
