We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
"Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."
"In terms of ArcSight Logger's most valuable feature, it is their scalability. ArcSight's real advantage is its scalability because they have two layers, including the logger layer."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"The most valuable feature is the search capability, which is simple to use."
"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"The ability to customize the solution in great detail is its most valuable features. We can customize the use cases and also have the ability to do scripting. We can personalize our dashboard as well. The scalability the solution offers is quite impressive."
"The deployment is easy and they provide very good documentation."
"Its cost-effectiveness is the most valuable aspect."
"The configuration assessment and Pile integrity monitoring features are decent."
"One of the most beneficial features of Wazuh, particularly in the context of security needs, is the machine learning data handling capability."
"It's stable."
"Wazuh has very flexible and robust features."
"Wazuh's most beneficial features for our security needs are flexibility, built-in rules, integration capabilities, and documentation."
"Wazuh is free and easy to use. It is also adjustable, and we can use it on the cloud and on-premises."
"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"I would like to see better scheduling in the next release of this solution."
"It would be better if the product is cheaper."
"The solution could be improved in maintenance settings."
"In the next release, I want to see more intelligence."
"The integration with other systems could be improved."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"Scalability is a challenge because it is distributed architecture and it uses Elastic DB. Their Elastic DB doesn't allow open source waste application."
"Its configuration process is time-consuming."
"The implementation is very complex."
"While it is scalable, it can suffer from reduced latencies."
"A lack of certain features creates limitations."
"We would like to see more improvements on the cloud."
"I have yet to find the same capability in Wazuh to get logs from different sources into the system"
"Wazuh could improve the detection, it is not detecting all of the attacks. Additionally, it is lacking features compared to other solutions."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 28th in Log Management with 31 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, LogRhythm SIEM and VMware Aria Operations for Logs, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, AlienVault OSSIM and Graylog. See our ArcSight Logger vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
