We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Bonita based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The shared repository allows for cross-functional cooperation instead of doing things in a silo. You can operate cross-functionally and really work end-to-end, instead of dividing everything up on a functional basis."
"Business Process Analysis: We can simulate, optimize, and analyse business processes based on various business requirements. It assures our rolling out the best processes."
"The EPC modeling is very detailed, the semantic check is helpful, and auto-layout simplifies the formatting."
"From an architectural point of view, when you're looking at the business area, you can find all the information you have to use as an architect."
"The BPMN notation and the share flow through users. It is nice to see all flows in a common, shared space for all the stakeholders to view the same thing and the same language."
"ARIS BPA has a good directory option, which helps to keep track of all of your metadata, and that's very useful."
"Object oriented modeling allows us to trace what's going on with the specified object."
"The most valuable features are business process modeling and reporting."
"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."
"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."
"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."
"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."
"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."
"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."
"Bonita is user-friendly."
"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."
"I would like to see the reporting aspects improved."
"It needs external API and the ability to navigate back, similar to "Back" in web browser."
"There are reports available in ARIS and you can modify them a bit if you want something more specific, but it's not that easy to adjust them and make modifications. It would be nice to have some kind of tool to do that, something that is more user-friendly for people who are not too technical, so that they could create reports the way they want them."
"There is a lot of room for improvement. They need to increase the performance of the system flow. They need to support it more. ARIS Process Governance is still quite basic, and they are using an old BPM and process automation module."
"I believe the solutions BPM tools are not very good and need improvements."
"Making it more customizable and easy to learn would be a benefit."
"The interface is a little archaic."
"Sometimes, ARIS BPA breaks down, and its stability can be improved."
"We are struggling a bit with integrations."
"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."
"It is missing some important features that other products have."
"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."
"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."
"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."
"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."
"There is a considerable learning curve."
ARIS BPA is ranked 4th in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Design with 27 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Bonita is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow and Appian. See our ARIS BPA vs. Bonita report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Esperaba algo mas de este estilo, sin embargo desarrollé esta tabla de comparación de Suites BPM, la cuál no puedo anexar por lo que dejo en formato de texto en caso deque alguien requiera este conocimiento.
Esta tabla fue desarrollada basandome en textos acádemicos de fuentes confiables. Sin embargo no pude encontrar el numero aproximado de clientes que usan ARIS, por lo que si alguien cuenta con esta información se lo agradecería mucho, ya que es el último dato que requiero para completar esta tabla comparativa.
BizAgi Suite, Bonita BPM, IBM Suite, ARIS + Webmethods, AuraPortal, Oracle Suite, Appian eBPM HOPEX
Requiere pago Software licenciado (anual o perpetuo), freeware en versiones académicas Versión pagada (licenciamiento anual) y versión gratuita Software licenciado Software licenciado Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita
Código abierto No Si (GPL) No No No No No No
Diseño intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Requiere tiempo de adaptación Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo
Acceso a licencia de prueba. Si No No Si Si No Si Si
Tutoriales y Soporte técnico Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si
Notación para diagramar BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0
Compatibilidad con base de datos SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, HSQL SQL Server SQL Server, Oracle SQL Server Oracle SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, Oracle
Sistema operativo Windows, Linux Multi-plataforma Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Mac Windows Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Solaris Windows
Monitoreo en tiempo real Si Si Si No Si Si Si Regular
Servicio en la nube Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si
Requiere programación No No Poco Poco No Si Poco No
Número de clientes >500 >1000 >3500 >800 >2000 >2000 >2700
Principales clientes Adidas Group, BBVA, Telefónica, BNP Paribas Xerox, Stanford University, CSC Barclays, Emericon, Banca popolare di Milano, Saperion Fujitsu, Coca Cola, Electrolux, ING, Credit Suisse Toyota, RSA Chile, Coprusa Group, Refinery of the Pacific REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie Amazon, M&T Bank, Nissan, Ford, Baxter Credit Union GNP, P&G, EuroControl, British American Tobacco
Permite importar/exportar archivos BPMN Si Si Si Si Si Solo importación Si Si
Nivel de documentación Medio Alto Medio Alto Alto Medio Bajo Alto
Considera reglas de Negocio Si Si No Si Si No Si Si
Validación de Modelo (diagramas) Si Si Si Si No Si Si
Permite simulación Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No
Requiere conocimiento del producto Poco Poco Normal Poco Poco Normal Normal Poco
Año primera versión lanzada 1989 2001 1998 2009 2001 1997 1999 1994
Accesibilidad móvil Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No
Nivel de seguridad Regular Regular Regular Alto Alto Alto
Facilidad de instalación Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Media Sencilla Media
Versión en español SI Si Si No Si Si No Si
Saludos.