We performed a comparison between Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization and Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization."The platform’s features for latency mitigation help optimize user experience."
"The solution includes features for SD-WAN and WAN such as batch conditioning and optimization."
"The most valuable features of Silver Peak VX is the flexibility, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, the long-distance performance of the application storage is easy and effective."
"The most valuable feature is the support for asymmetric lines."
"The tool's most valuable feature is bandwidth optimization."
"First and foremost, it enables the customer to deploy high availability connections. This kind of solution enables them to deploy these HA connections for policies mostly automatically. It's a more automated approach than with other vendors."
"The initial setup is very easy and not confusing."
"The platform is valuable for bandwidth reduction."
"At the moment, for us, it is a very good solution because it has all the features we need and it is not so expensive."
"Currently, we encounter challenges in terms of the functioning of compression, deduplication, and other features even after uploading the certificate for encrypted traffic."
"The support from Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect has declined since Aruba acquired them. The knowledge and speed of the agents could improve."
"If compared with Cisco, then Aruba's pricing is very aggressive."
"More technical sessions should be offered for deploying the solution."
"In future releases, I would like to see security features, so Aruba might need some firewalls, like other vendors."
"There are some functional limitations that could improve."
"This solution is suitable for small to medium-sized companies. If we have large-sized companies it is better to use Cisco or Palo Alto."
"The license features should improve in the solution. For example, when you purchase VMware, it starts at a low level that has some functionality. When you want to expand, the difference in the price is substantial. I purchased the lower functional version for $4,000, and now if I want to upgrade, they ask me for $80,000. This is a $76,000 difference, there's no logic, but this is VMware."
"Reporting is something that they can improve on."
More Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is ranked 12th in WAN Optimization with 1 review while Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is ranked 1st in WAN Optimization with 19 reviews. Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is rated 0.0, while Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization writes "Easy-to-deploy with valuable features for web optimization ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform writes "Flexible, efficient, and responsive support". Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is most compared with , whereas Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Prisma SD-WAN and Cato SASE Cloud Platform.
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.