We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution has been working well."
"It's a great solution with multi-vendor support. That's always useful."
"It's very easy to access support and the documentation is self-explanatory."
"We can double verify whether a machine is compliant with our policy on the one hand, and on the other hand if it's one of our machines we let it into the network."
"What I like best about Aruba ClearPass is its 802.1X certificate-based authentication feature."
"The visibility and security features are most valuable. We get a clear view. It is a very secure product for educational institutions."
"ClearPass is effortless to use and configure. It's not hard to learn the tool, and it has lots of features."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"The initial setup was quite complex, it is not that easy."
"One area for improvement would be the possibility of using social media providers for user authentication."
"The implementation can improve because it is challenging to explain some of the concepts to the client."
"A specific component is part of the solution called ClearPass Onboard, which can sometimes be complex and challenging to set up. If they could simplify the process and make it easier, that would be a benefit."
"The setup of ClearPass can be a bit convoluted at times."
"The improvement can be in the cloud area. They can improve it for the cloud so that we can deploy it on the cloud."
"The product's graphical user interface (GUI) could use an update and better integration between the guest management and policy management interfaces."
"If you look at the tool's deployment phase from a fine-tuning perspective, I feel it was very complex."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 13th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and Genian NAC, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform and Fortinet FortiNAC. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.