We performed a comparison between Aruba Wireless and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The solution is stable."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"Aruba Wireless offers a good user experience."
"The technical support is 24/7 from the UA."
"Although there are other solutions available and some with a lower initial cost, they don't offer the same level of integration with IoT as this solution without having to add additional hardware, which ends up costing more."
"Aruba Central is a valuable feature because I can monitor access points remotely, even if I'm not in the office."
"Its manageability of APs is the most valuable feature: ease of adding APs and the ability to configure the APs on the fly. Also, their support engineers are great to work with."
"The Airwave is the best feature for a single management point for all APs in the environment."
"Overall, it's a very strong solution."
"This is the second time I've implemented and installed this solution and I think it is outstanding. The support is excellent and so is the hardware. We don't need much support because nothing really goes wrong."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"The initial setup was easy."
"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."
"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."
"It has given us a huge leg-up when competing with other managed service providers who use different vendors because of the visibility it gives us to customers' traffic for troubleshooting purposes."
"We can see what the network is being used for or where problems may be."
"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"They need to increase the number of routers on the controller."
"The management system would be better if it were more polished, if it had a better interface like, for example, Meraki"
"I used to have issues with DHCP. It is extremely buggy and difficult to upgrade with different firmware versions/models."
"The solution is now taking eight to 12 months to deliver the product."
"Aruba Wireless could improve the interface, it does not have a smart web interface. Other solutions have smart web interfaces, such as Cisco Meraki."
"Most of the access points don't include the chargers."
"Improvements to the GUI, such as being able to search in the Mobility Master, would be nice."
"Aruba’s poor performance and random upgrade issues caused too much time consuming maintenance and troubleshooting."
"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."
"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"The setup was complex."
"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."
"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."
"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."
"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless LAN with 138 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Aruba Wireless is rated 8.4, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Wireless writes "The portal for centralized management and virtual controller for APs are very valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Aruba Wireless is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Huawei Wireless, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cisco Wireless. See our Aruba Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.