We performed a comparison between Aruba Wireless and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN."You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The initial setup was very easy and intuitive."
"I like the analytics feature."
"Aruba is easier than Juniper."
"We like the centralized configuration and monitoring."
"It has very flexible features."
"Aruba Wireless is easily scaled between a lot of devices and a lot of endpoints. When we decided to use it as our solution, we had planned to use it exactly for its ability to scale."
"The most valuable feature in this product would be the stability. You build it, install it, and it’s good to go, with no further tweaks needed unless adding or replacing APs."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Wireless is multi-tenancy."
"Ubiquiti is intuitive. The management interface is user-friendly. You can easily make changes and do the things that need to be done."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is very scalable. I don't know that there's a limit to the scalability. We just add more data switches to power more access points. We haven't come across a situation where it can't handle the Ubiquiti equipment."
"It functions properly and includes centralized management for access points and switches."
"It's a well priced solution and as far as I'm concerned, it's enterprise class."
"The failure rate is very low on these devices - I've had them installed for five years and have only lost one out of a hundred."
"Overall, it's a straightforward solution."
"Their hardware is very good."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to use the main centralized administration process and the internet."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"The logging is hard to read when troubleshooting issues."
"There needs to be better visibility on the day-to-day monitoring."
"The solution's documentation could be better organized in an information portal."
"The solution's GUI for configuration could be better."
"Our customers ask for a security portfolio, which the tool doesn't have."
"Making the setup more simple is an area for improvement in Aruba Wireless. Security-wise, this solution also needs work."
"To enhance the system, more work on integration would be beneficial."
"An area of this product that could use improvement would be the troubleshooting. At times I had to engage Aruba Support which ran some pretty complicated troubleshooting commands. I would not have been able to do with existing CLI documentation."
"The documentation and support provided by the solution areas of concern where improvements are required."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve stability."
"The technical support services need improvement."
"Ubiquiti is also slow to adopt new technologies. We are transitioning to Wi-Fi 6, and there aren't many products. They have mostly Wi-Fi 5 products, but there are only two Wi-Fi 6 products. It's okay for places we have already equipped, but it's a bit hard for new places."
"The accessibility to technical support could be better."
"I would like to see more cloud features that some of the other competitors such as Cisco Meraki have that are very nice."
"I would like local support from the parent company."
"The cost is on the higher side and could be lower."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless LAN with 138 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Aruba Wireless is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Wireless writes "The portal for centralized management and virtual controller for APs are very valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Aruba Wireless is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and ExtremeWireless, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, ExtremeCloud IQ and Fortinet FortiWLM.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
