We performed a comparison between Asana and Procore Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."I love the way it monitors all of the current and past projects, and it sends notifications to keep everything on the track."
"What I like the most about Asana is its API integrations because we use a lot of cluttered toolsets in our company since we need to cater to different clients, for which its integration gives us a lot of flexibility."
"The most valuable feature of Asana is the tracking of comments and documents in one place."
"My task box displays all of our tasks, organized by day, helping us to focus on what needs to be done each day."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"By using this software, I have adaptability in my work, and it can improve the production of our company."
"It's an easy way to communicate."
"The ability to share projects and tasks among team members appears to be the most valuable feature."
"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."
"This solution has a learning curve, where it is initially difficult to use."
"It would be beneficial if Asana had a predecessor feature that automatically adjusts all subsequent dates when changes are made to a timeline. For example, if I assign a designer four hours for one task and two days for another, and the completion of a task takes longer than anticipated, it would be convenient if updating one date could prompt the adjustment of all other relevant dates. Essentially, this feature would streamline the process and eliminate the need for manual adjustments."
"The mobile application of Asana has to be improved a lot because no one wants to do a complete project management task on mobile."
"It would be great if Asana could create a library for each project within the interface."
"The messaging feature could be better."
"A user should be able to identify an assignee for specific tasks or task types while applying the template, or at a minimum, allow for a default assignee. As it is, the template gets created with the just task dates driven by the project start and end dates inputted by the user. In my current situation, I'm assigning myself to many tasks, so I have to do that manually every time. Even if I eventually start adding other people to assign tasks, there won't be more than a handful to do. However, those few people will have multiple tasks. It would be nice to be able to select those individuals during the setup rather than having to do so manually once the project has been created."
"Currently, there are only a few available options, but it would be helpful to have more control over the notifications received."
"The product must reduce the information on the interface."
"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."
Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while Procore Project Management is ranked 24th in Project Management Software with 1 review. Asana is rated 8.4, while Procore Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Stands out with portfolios, easy setup, and real-time information, but needs big improvement when it comes to workflows, automation, and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Procore Project Management writes "Helps with project management and offers good value for money". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project, Wrike, monday.com and Planview PPM Pro, whereas Procore Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Meridian Proliance PPM, Planview PPM Pro and Planisware.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.