We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."
"The solution is easy to learn, understand and develop."
"We find the solution to be scalable."
"The solution is very easy to maintain because UI management is simple and many libraries are available."
"It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is its visual side, which makes building Windows forms applications visually efficient."
"ASP.NET works well with Windows applications and more generally, the Windows platform."
"It is seamless compared to Java or any other technology stack."
"The most valuable feature is how smoothly it runs."
"I was testing how to publish in a cloud using Azure and it was very easy."
"It is definitely sophisticated and provides many out-of-the-box features. Going community has boosted all that."
"We can use different .NET features."
"I like the product's connection with Azure analytics services and the ability to build the model on the cloud."
"Most valuable features include code navigation by symbols and document auto formatting."
"The installation of the solution is easy."
"It is a straightforward solution to set up."
"Sometimes it can be really difficult to debug using ASP.NET. When there's an issue, trying to find out the cause is not always easy, so debugging is the top area for improvement, in my opinion."
"An area for improvement is the structure template."
"ASP.NET is not the best solution for all companies looking to implement a solution like it."
"The technology to integrate with cloud information could be improved."
"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."
"Scripted languages like AngularJS and Node.js are much faster than using ASP on the client side."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
"I am sure there is something that has room for improvement but nothing specific comes to mind."
"It has a ton of options and that sometimes can become very, very overwhelming for a new person, a new developer."
"There is room for improvement in the price of the solution overall."
"It would be nice if Visual Studio's extensions and updates could self-correct, if they are not working or disabled, and also inform the user."
"File installations are heavy."
"This solution could be integrated with other open-source languages, such as Python and not only C#, .NET or Microsoft development languages."
"Sometimes, the deprecation of packages can be a challenge."
"The product could be improved by including axle intelligence."
"Microsoft Visual Studio could improve by being compatible with more operating systems. However, we understand the solution is proprietary to Microsoft."
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.