We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Dollar Universe Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."
"We get better reports than we use to have."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the functions are easy to use."
"The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users."
"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good."
"It is stable, it works, and it does what it is supposed to."
"The ability to create calendars, calendering for batch jobs to run on a scheduled frequency."
"AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable."
"The solution is easy to use and is one of its most valuable features...I rate its scalability a nine out of ten."
"Some of the automation options are quite good."
"The most valuable features of Dollar Universe Workload Automation are stability and scalability."
"We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement."
"SQL server clustering is not supported."
"It would be helpful to be able to monitor and manage workload windows so we could minimize downstream applications. This would allow us easier access to the applications."
"A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that."
"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."
"The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement."
"The graphical interface can be improved."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"The interface of Dollar Universe Workload Automation could improve to something more modern. Additionally, Kubernetes is not an option to use in"
"There are some features that don't work as expected."
"The solution needs stability improvement when connecting to the script or trying to find something. It takes a few seconds to perform the function or needs a complete reorganization."
More Dollar Universe Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Dollar Universe Workload Automation is ranked 20th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Dollar Universe Workload Automation is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dollar Universe Workload Automation writes "An easy-to-use and scalable solution needing some improvement in stability". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and CA Workload Automation iXp, whereas Dollar Universe Workload Automation is most compared with Automic Workload Automation, Control-M and Stonebranch. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Dollar Universe Workload Automation report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.