We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and HCL Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"It gives us flexibility when doing releases. We can make changes for one day in a PDS member, since we stage our jobs by date, and the next day the normal job definitions are run."
"CA Workload Automation AutoSys Edition is one of the most powerful schedulers that you have on the open systems, or going between Window servers; to be able to schedule and take advantage of the different powers that the automation has with it."
"It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers."
"It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets."
"We get better reports than we use to have."
"It streamlines processing really well, so we're able to cut down on our processing times."
"It has improved my organization by automating IT applications."
"Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot."
"We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement."
"SQL server clustering is not supported."
"Some of the reports are either a bit hard to understand or don’t give you what you might expect to see."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"In terms of what should be in the next release, I want integration and AI and so on. I'd like easy reporting where you can compare information, for example, "that job normally takes three minutes and last time it took six minutes or 10 minutes." Then you can get the information to the engineer of which job is taking more time than normal - understanding strange behavior compared to the baseline."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."
"The interface needs some improvements."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while HCL Workload Automation is ranked 25th in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while HCL Workload Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL Workload Automation writes "Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas HCL Workload Automation is most compared with IBM Workload Automation, Control-M, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.