We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodePipeline based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integration is a good feature."
"The solution provides good integrations."
"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"The integration is a good feature."
"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"The integrations are good."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"The setup time is a bit long."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI and GitHub Actions, whereas AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins and GitHub Actions. See our AWS CodeBuild vs. AWS CodePipeline report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
