We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and CircleCI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"The integrations are good."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."
"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."
"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."
"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."
"It's a stable product."
"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"The setup time is a bit long."
"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."
"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."
"Billing is a mess."
"The solution’s pricing could be better."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while CircleCI is ranked 11th in Build Automation with 5 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while CircleCI is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CircleCI writes "Unhelpful support, unclear billing, and has offers ability to track usage". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and GoCD, whereas CircleCI is most compared with TeamCity, Tekton, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Bamboo. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
