AWS Lambda vs Google Cloud Dataflow comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
11,937 views|8,175 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Google Logo
4,763 views|3,959 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Dataflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Compute Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Lambda is the preferred compute option because of on-demand cost. We don't have to provision any hardware beforehand. We don't have to provision the capacity required for the services because it is serverless.""The most valuable feature of AWS Lambda is that you can trigger and run jobs instantly, and after you complete the job, that function is either destroyed or stopped automatedly.""It's a fairly easy solution to learn.""I think the most valuable feature is the agility of the solution.""The stability is good.""The solution is highly scalable.""AWS Lambda is a stable solution.""We use AWS Lambda because it provides a solution for our needs without requiring us to manage our infrastructure. With the tool, we only pay for the resources we use. Additionally, it is straightforward to implement and integrates with other services like API Gateway."

More AWS Lambda Pros →

"The support team is good and it's easy to use.""It is a scalable solution.""I don't need a server running all the time while using the tool. It is also easy to setup. The product offers a pay-as-you-go service.""The product's installation process is easy...The tool's maintenance part is somewhat easy.""The solution allows us to program in any language we desire.""The service is relatively cheap compared to other batch-processing engines.""Google Cloud Dataflow is useful for streaming and data pipelines.""The most valuable features of Google Cloud Dataflow are scalability and connectivity."

More Google Cloud Dataflow Pros →

Cons
"If you are setting it up on hybrid solution, there is a lot of work that needs to go in.""Amazon doesn't have enough local support based in our country.""The security needs to be improved.""I would like to see more integration with other platforms.""There were some timeout issues with AWS Lambda as the options provided didn't suit our business cases.""There's room for improvement in the solution's warm start, which refers to the minimum time it takes to start up a Lambda function if you haven't been running it.""The metrics and reporting for this solution could be improved.""We've had to revamp the way that it works due to that 15-minute timeout limitation."

More AWS Lambda Cons →

"The authentication part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Google Cloud Dataflow should include a little cost optimization.""When I deploy the product in local errors, a lot of errors pop up which are not always caught. The solution's error logging is bad. It can take a lot of time to debug the errors. It needs to have better logs.""I would like Google Cloud Dataflow to be integrated with IT data flow and other related services to make it easier to use as it is a complex tool.""They should do a market survey and then make improvements.""The deployment time could also be reduced.""There are certain challenges regarding the Google Cloud Composer which can be improved.""The solution's setup process could be more accessible."

More Google Cloud Dataflow Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AWS is slightly more expensive than Azure."
  • "Its pricing is on the higher side."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable and it is a pay-per-use model. It is very good for cost optimization."
  • "The cost is based on runtime."
  • "The fees are volume-based."
  • "AWS Lambda is inexpensive."
  • "Lambda is a good and cheap solution and I would recommend it to those without a huge payload."
  • "For licensing, we pay a yearly subscription."
  • More AWS Lambda Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the solution depends on many factors, such as how they pay for tools in the company and its size."
  • "Google Cloud is slightly cheaper than AWS."
  • "The tool is cheap."
  • "Google Cloud Dataflow is a cheap solution."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Google Cloud Dataflow's pricing a four out of ten."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven to eight out of ten."
  • "The solution is not very expensive."
  • More Google Cloud Dataflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use… more »
    Top Answer:The tool scales automatically based on the number of incoming requests.
    Top Answer:We only need to pay for the compute time our code consumes. The solution does not cost much.
    Top Answer:The product's installation process is easy...The tool's maintenance part is somewhat easy.
    Top Answer:The authentication part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. For some common users, the solution's authentication part is difficult to use. The scalability of the… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    11,937
    Comparisons
    8,175
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    391
    Rating
    8.6
    7th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    4,763
    Comparisons
    3,959
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    308
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Google Dataflow
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Lambda is a compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. AWS Lambda executes your code only when needed and scales automatically, from a few requests per day to thousands per second. You pay only for the compute time you consume - there is no charge when your code is not running. With AWS Lambda, you can run code for virtually any type of application or backend service - all with zero administration. AWS Lambda runs your code on a high-availability compute infrastructure and performs all of the administration of the compute resources, including server and operating system maintenance, capacity provisioning and automatic scaling, code monitoring and logging. All you need to do is supply your code in one of the languages that AWS Lambda supports (currently Node.js, Java, C# and Python).

    You can use AWS Lambda to run your code in response to events, such as changes to data in an Amazon S3 bucket or an Amazon DynamoDB table; to run your code in response to HTTP requests using Amazon API Gateway; or invoke your code using API calls made using AWS SDKs. With these capabilities, you can use Lambda to easily build data processing triggers for AWS services like Amazon S3 and Amazon DynamoDB process streaming data stored in Amazon Kinesis, or create your own back end that operates at AWS scale, performance, and security.

    Google Dataflow is a unified programming model and a managed service for developing and executing a wide range of data processing patterns including ETL, batch computation, and continuous computation. Cloud Dataflow frees you from operational tasks like resource management and performance optimization.
    Sample Customers
    Netflix
    Absolutdata, Backflip Studios, Bluecore, Claritics, Crystalloids, Energyworx, GenieConnect, Leanplum, Nomanini, Redbus, Streak, TabTale
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Non Profit5%
    Educational Organization5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization47%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Retailer11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise51%
    Large Enterprise39%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Compute Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: April 2024.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Lambda is ranked 1st in Compute Service with 70 reviews while Google Cloud Dataflow is ranked 7th in Streaming Analytics with 10 reviews. AWS Lambda is rated 8.6, while Google Cloud Dataflow is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AWS Lambda writes "An easily scalable solution with a variety of use cases and valuable event-based triggers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Dataflow writes "Easy to use for programmers, user-friendly, and scalable". AWS Lambda is most compared with AWS Batch, Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling, Apache NiFi, Apache Spark and Amazon EC2, whereas Google Cloud Dataflow is most compared with Databricks, Apache NiFi, Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis and Azure Stream Analytics.

    We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.