We performed a comparison between AWS Secrets Manager and Delinea Secret Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The API is fine and works well."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Secrets Manager is the ability to keep data secret and assign access permissions to people to grant or restrict access."
"The product is easy to use and is inexpensive."
"The most valuable feature is the management of credentials."
"It's highly scalable, so I'd rate it a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"Integrating with other services was straightforward, especially within the AWS environment."
"The most valuable feature is usability, as it is quite user-friendly."
"The solution is scalable."
"I really like the zero trust piece."
"It is a stable solution."
"It offers the possibility of secure administration of hardware devices, as well as Linux systems administration from a Windows environment."
"We implemented the product for our privileged identities. We have configured them in check-in/check-out rotation. Delinea Secret Server rotates the password each time a privileged identity is checked in, making the password valid only for some time."
"The surveillance is most valuable."
"The product provides a native user experience without requiring users to install additional software or agents."
"Provides us with the ability to control access [to secrets] by groups."
"There is a need for better environmental implementation, such as having a security fund as a solution."
"An area for improvement in AWS Secrets Manager could be expanding integration options beyond AWS services."
"We occasionally have problems with rate limits, although that is a problem more generally with AWS."
"It would be good if the AWS Secrets Manager were more customizable."
"The solution's initial setup process is complicated."
"AWS Secrets Manager could support hybrid infrastructure."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"There is room for improvement in terms of integrating with certain other platforms."
"I think that the main interface should integrate better with non-standard applications and clients, to connect with other systems."
"The UI needs improvement because the interface is a little clumsy."
"As I am partial to CyberArk, I rate Thycotic Password Reset Server as a nine out of ten, owing to the minor glitches I mentioned."
"We find the documentation hard to understand."
"Delinea Secret Server needs to improve its reporting."
"It would be better if they had a Linux version of the secret server."
"The API is no good."
"They could improve the container platform and SPO."
AWS Secrets Manager is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Password Managers with 12 reviews while Delinea Secret Server is ranked 6th in Enterprise Password Managers with 47 reviews. AWS Secrets Manager is rated 8.8, while Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Secrets Manager writes "Seamlessly integrates with various AWS services while offering reasonable pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". AWS Secrets Manager is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, 1Password, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and LastPass, whereas Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and LastPass. See our AWS Secrets Manager vs. Delinea Secret Server report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
