We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and StackPath WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."One common use case is using detection protection for enhancing security models in AWS. Another use case is implementing log analysis and response recovery procedures for email services."
"The web solution effectively protects from vulnerabilities and cyber attacks."
"The most valuable feature is the security, making sure that files are protected, preventing unauthorized users from accessing the system."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability because it automatically scales up or scales down as per our requirements."
"We preferred the product based on its cost. AWS WAF is an out-of-the-box solution and integrates with the AWS services that we use. It's natively integrated with AWS."
"The ability to take multiple data sets and match those data sets together is the solution's most valuable feature. The data lake that comes with it is very useful because that allows us to match data sets with different configurations that we wouldn't normally be able to match."
"The simple configuration and the scalability have been most valuable. We are able to scale across all of our different AWS instances."
"The tool’s stability is very good."
"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."
"This solution could be improved if the configuration steps were more specific to WAF, compared to other cloud services."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"AWS WAF should provide better protection to its users, and the security features need to improve."
"They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies."
"The price could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"I would like to see the addition of more advanced rate-limiting features in the next release. It would be beneficial to extend rate limiting beyond just web servers to the main node level."
"They should make the implementation process faster."
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while StackPath WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with Sucuri.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.