Axonius vs Brinqa comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Axonius Logo
1,466 views|1,081 comparisons
Brinqa Logo
198 views|130 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities.
Top Answer:I would rate the costliness of the solution at a seven out of ten. It is on the expensive side and there are some additional fees.
Top Answer:Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision. We felt they were somewhat slow in assisting us in maturing our processes. Additionally, we encountered some… more »
Ranking
Views
1,466
Comparisons
1,081
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
198
Comparisons
130
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
746
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
JupiterOne logo
Compared 25% of the time.
ServiceNow logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Armis logo
Compared 13% of the time.
runZero logo
Compared 12% of the time.
Vulcan Cyber logo
Compared 18% of the time.
Nucleus logo
Compared 10% of the time.
Avalor logo
Compared 10% of the time.
Tenable Nessus logo
Compared 9% of the time.
Learn More
Overview

The more devices we introduce into our work environments, the more solutions we buy to manage them. Products like NAC, SIEM and endpoint protection tools provide valuable, but siloed, information that gives little visibility into the big picture.

Brinqa GRC provides a pluggable set of building blocks for meeting your IT process governance, risk management, and compliance reporting needs.
Sample Customers
Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company14%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company13%
Insurance Company9%
Retailer8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise78%

Axonius is ranked 2nd in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) while Brinqa is ranked 3rd in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) with 1 review. Axonius is rated 0.0, while Brinqa is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". Axonius is most compared with JupiterOne, ServiceNow, Armis, runZero and ManageEngine IT Asset Management, whereas Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Nucleus, Avalor, Tenable Nessus and Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM).

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.