We performed a comparison between Axway AMPLIFY API Management and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is security."
"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."
"This product is a ten when it comes to API management."
"We like the portal for documentation a lot."
"In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers."
"This platform can be highly scalable."
"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."
"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."
"There are a lot of tools to help the manager. WSO2 is very easy to install. It has all the principal functionalities that you think about when you want to put up the management solution. It's a very friendly tool."
"The solution is stable."
"WSO2 API Manager has a user-friendly model."
"Yes WSO2 API Manager is scalable"
"The solution is open source and easy to configure."
"A complete integration suite and a good platform."
"Most of the time, we need to install a plug-in without having any lapse in services or restarting the application. The WSO2 platform can do all deployments without any downtime."
"The scalability is fine for our purposes."
"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."
"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."
"Team management capabilities could be improved."
"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."
"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."
"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."
"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."
"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."
"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."
"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The price and the complexities attached to the solution are two areas of concern where improvements are required."
"The user interface needs to improve, it is a bit outdated."
"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."
"I would improve the product documentation. There are some gaps, and it can be difficult to find the proper documentation for the product if you need to solve something."
"From a product perspective, the first thing is that although the documentation provided by WSO2 is good, it could be much better. We're in the middle of a complex migration, moving away from VMs to Kubernetes with the latest version of WSO2 and good documentation is essential to us right now."
Axway AMPLIFY API Management is ranked 15th in API Management with 12 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 8th in API Management with 33 reviews. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is rated 7.8, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY API Management writes "An API management solution for ESB and B2B integration between systems with security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". Axway AMPLIFY API Management is most compared with Apigee, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management, Kong Gateway Enterprise and IBM API Connect, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Traefik Enterprise. See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
