We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and Harbor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The continuity screen is a valuable feature."
"It's great for storing images on containers."
"Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution."
"Feature-wise, the security model and access controls are pretty straightforward and valuable"
"Specific tokens can be used to set folder structure or restrict things like read or write access."
"We like the fact that this is a secure solution, that employs a token-based system, which can be used to manage all the applications under this product."
"Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks."
"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"Right now this is the leading product in this category."
"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."
"We have found that it is sometimes difficult to pull images from the host application."
"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."
"They can improve their scalability."
"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."
"The solution has no areas that need improvement."
"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."
"The setup process is mildly complex. There is no straightforward management platform, so there's a level of complexity to it."
"The product should integrate better with other storage options."
"The GUI needs to improve."
Earn 20 points
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while Harbor is ranked 2nd in Container Registry. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while Harbor is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harbor writes "Check document vulnerabilities with this cloud-native product that needs to improve in ease-of-use". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Red Hat Quay, whereas Harbor is most compared with JFrog Container Registry, Red Hat Quay, Amazon ECR, VMware Harbor Registry and DigitalOcean Container Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
