Azure Web Application Firewall vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has been a stable product in my experience.""Azure WAF is extremely stable.""We have found the most valuable features to be the web application, minimal skills required for management, control through policies, and automation.""The integration it has with GitHub is great.""The initial setup is easy and straightforward...Azure Web Application Firewall is a scalable product.""It's quite a stable product and works well with Microsoft products.""The most valuable feature is that it allows us to publish our applications behind the firewall.""The solution has good dashboards."

More Azure Web Application Firewall Pros →

"We like that there's load balancing, firewall capabilities, DDoS protection, et cetera, all covered by Cloudflare.""It is configurable via API.""The integration of Cloudflare with Cloud Suite is its most valuable feature.""The security features are valuable. The particular feature we use is called OWASP.""It is a SaaS solution unlike much of the competition.""Caching is the most valuable feature of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.""The Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's most valuable feature is its ease of configuration.""The initial setup process is simple."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pros →

Cons
"From a reporting perspective, they could do more there.""Deployment should be simplified so that a non-techie can handle it.""There is a need to be able to configure the solution more.""Azure WAF should not be deployed in the middle of the traffic.""The support for proxy forwarding could improve.""The management can be improved.""In Brazil, we have some problems with the phone service that affect our connection with the cloud. However, it isn't common.""I would say that Azure's customer service is not that good...I am not very happy with the support offered."

More Azure Web Application Firewall Cons →

"If they add logs history within the Cloudflare offering, that would be a great benefit.""The accuracy of the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall could be improved by reducing the number of false-negative alerts.""A key challenge arises when dealing with numerous integrations with HVAC systems. Depending on the specifics, there might be some configuration mismatches, which necessitate specific support.""I have experienced some difficulties with Cloudflare's support as a customer based in India.""The ModSecurity core rules need to be updated.""There could be an option to duplicate the cluster to maintain the consistency of rules.""Cloudflare Web Application Firewall should improve visibility for a customer.""The blocked logs are difficult to read at times."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft and the pricing is good."
  • "The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed."
  • "The price of the solution depends on your architecture and how you manage it. You can control the cost in Azure quite well. The costs do not directly correlate to expenses in the features we are using."
  • "Azure WAF has price advantages over other WAF solutions. The pricing model is flexible because you pay on a scale based on the level of protection you need."
  • "I give the pricing a nine out of ten."
  • More Azure Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."
  • "We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
  • "The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."
  • "Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."
  • "The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."
  • "Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."
  • More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration it has with GitHub is great.
    Top Answer:The pricing is quite high. It's not cheap. The free version doesn't have the capability a user would need.
    Top Answer:The documentation needs to be improved. It's not ideal. There are multiple deployment options. However, there is a lack of clarity around them. There's no real community to reach out to and no videos… more »
    Top Answer:The product has a valuable security control functionality.
    Top Answer:Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions.
    Top Answer:The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,640
    Comparisons
    4,628
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    474
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    8,483
    Comparisons
    6,180
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cloudflare WAF
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Pharma/Biotech Company14%
    Government14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business9%
    Large Enterprise91%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise42%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Web Application Firewall is ranked 12th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 9 reviews while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 7th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 16 reviews. Azure Web Application Firewall is rated 8.4, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Azure Web Application Firewall writes "It's a good option if you want a solution that's ready to go and easy for your team to learn". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "A cloud solution for web application firewall protection with rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules". Azure Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, Azure Firewall, Azure Front Door and F5 Advanced WAF, whereas Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai App and API Protector, AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door. See our Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.