We performed a comparison between Azure Web Application Firewall and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a good option if you want a solution that's ready to go and easy for your team to learn. It's cloud-based, so you don't need to buy or maintain any hardware infrastructure."
"Azure WAF is extremely stable."
"The integration it has with GitHub is great."
"It's quite a stable product and works well with Microsoft products."
"The initial setup is easy and straightforward...Azure Web Application Firewall is a scalable product."
"We have found the most valuable features to be the web application, minimal skills required for management, control through policies, and automation."
"The solution has good dashboards."
"It has been a stable product in my experience."
"On the real time, you can see live traffic, which is flowing into our website."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it is easy to configure."
"Imperva DDoS is fairly stable, and its availability is quite high."
"On the activity log, I can see the exact details, the visit, and the threat."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The documentation needs to be improved."
"I would say that Azure's customer service is not that good...I am not very happy with the support offered."
"Deployment should be simplified so that a non-techie can handle it."
"There is a need to be able to configure the solution more."
"The management can be improved."
"From a reporting perspective, they could do more there."
"The support for proxy forwarding could improve."
"Azure WAF should not be deployed in the middle of the traffic."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"Imperva DDoS does not provide version control."
"I would like to have support for SSL management and secure DNS."
"A limited tool if you're looking to customize."
"It would be better if we were able to manage and apply changes to multiple websites/web applications, and search WAF logs for multiple websites, via the Incapsula dashboard."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"The rules surrounding the making of web applications could be improved."
More Azure Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Web Application Firewall is ranked 12th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 9 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews. Azure Web Application Firewall is rated 8.4, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Azure Web Application Firewall writes "It's a good option if you want a solution that's ready to go and easy for your team to learn". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". Azure Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, Azure Firewall, Azure Front Door and F5 Advanced WAF, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF. See our Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Imperva DDoS report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.