We compared N-able Cove Data Protection and Barracuda Intronis Backup across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: N-able Cove Data Protection is considered user-friendly and reliable. Users praised its cloud-based data protection and efficient backup and restoration functionalities. Barracuda Intronis Backup is praised for its strong backup capabilities, user-friendly cloud management portal, and staff training opportunities.
Room for Improvement: N-able Cove Data Protection could be improved by simplifying image restoration, enhancing the graphical interface, and offering more detailed user permissions. The Barracuda Intronis Backup could improve its integration, speed, and orchestration capabilities.
Service and Support: N-able Cove Data Protection's customer service is highly regarded for its knowledgeable support team and ability to resolve issues over the phone. Customers have consistently praised Barracuda Intronis Backup for their excellent and knowledgeable technical support. However, some reviewers reported challenges with escalation and communication within the support team.
Ease of Deployment: Setting up N-able Cove Data Protection is considered straightforward and simple, requiring minimal training. However, deploying to virtual machines or specialty setups may require more effort with N-able. The setup process for Barracuda Intronis Backup is simple and involves configuring IP settings and connecting to Cloud Control.
Pricing: N-able Cove Data Protection is competitively priced and offers unlimited storage for on-premise cloud usage. Users like the adjustable scale option for licensing, which helps them save costs and ensures fair pricing. Barracuda Intronis Backup provides a comprehensive and reasonably priced setup package.
ROI: N-able Cove Data Protection has demonstrated notable cost savings, enhanced efficiency, and positive returns on investment for businesses. Barracuda Intronis Backup provides added financial benefits and time efficiency.
Comparison Results: N-able Cove Data Protection offers effective cloud-based data protection and smooth integration with other tools. However, some reviews noted that image restoration could be simplified, and others said the GUI could use a revamp. Barracuda Intronis Backup stands out for its extensive training resources and direct cloud mapping, but users would like to see better performance and integration.
"The superior support from Barracuda in setting up, using, and helping with issues for the product."
"They are the best support that we have had so far. When you contact or email them, they are very quick to respond. They always have someone available for us. That's what we want as a customer, we want someone to listen to us."
"Most important is its ease of use. You plug it in, follow the steps, and you have your backup file."
"Its interface is intuitive, and it is easy to use when I am restoring files. Barracuda does a really excellent job at compression, which makes it very efficient. Eight years later, I am only halfway through to the capacity, which is very good."
"Barracuda's support is probably one of the best things about them, even with all their solutions. With any problem that we have, or even questions, we get the assistance that we need. The turnaround is pretty quick."
"We perform backup drills to test the functionality, and we don't have any problems."
"The product is easy to install and use while doing what it is expected to do."
"It is very stable, and I'm very happy with this solution."
"It's extremely important that Cove provides cloud-based data protection with backup, disaster recovery, and archiving. That is a necessity for my insurance. As an IT company, my insurance would cost more if my backups were not offsite and off-network."
"It provides a single dashboard for all types of data protection, we monitor everything through a single dashboard. It simplifies everything overall. It allows us to see everything, whether passing or failing any issues, any problems through a single pane of glass that we don't have to click through or adjust as we go forward."
"It's their cloud, it's their storage. I don't have to buy a space on Amazon or Google's cloud and then use their software to push it. That works well for me. This way, I don't have to worry about another option or the opportunity that there might be a credential leak."
"The most valuable feature is that it's hands-off. I log in every morning and there are pre-canned filters that I've created to make my life easier. I have something called server status color bars, and that gives me all the servers and, in a nutshell, I can see: if any errors are being reported; when the last backup was; if one is not working, should there be one, and it literally jumps off the page."
"The product is simple to use and manage. The customers have access to verify the backups."
"The most valuable feature by far is the Virtual Disaster Recovery. On top of that is the bare-metal recovery. The recovery options that we have are great. We have tested the Virtual Disaster Recovery and the bare-metal recovery in just about any scenario you can think of. We have even restored bare metal, a full server, to a laptop, and had full functionality. It's just insane how well it works and how simple it is. It does most of the work for you."
"One of the bigger features and advantages of the solution is that it is easy to integrate with my RMM which is also N-able."
"The ability to back up, restore, and do different types of testing for the preventative maintenance has really increased our importance to these clients because they see the value in how fast we can get them back up and running. We're saving them money in that way."
"The web interface needs to contain a more up-to-date view of the hardware."
"Its speed can be a bit improved, and of course, its pricing can go a lot cheaper."
"The tool is not user-friendly. The solution should also improve its compatibility. It is also not license-based."
"I would like to see better integration with third-party applications."
"It is not always stable."
"The backup feature could be a bit simpler to utilize. They should make the process of backing up individual files simpler."
"The solution is pretty expensive. This is the usual customer complaint."
"The restore time can be improved. The restore time for large quantities of folders is slow. Sometimes, if I'm doing a full recovery of a server, it takes multiple hours, which probably is natural. It might also be because of our internet speed to the cloud."
"I have some issues with the agent failing on workstations. I've had to completely uninstall several of them, delete everything, and start over to get them to work."
"This solution is not very good for image restores, mainly just files. The solution also does not allow you to enable or disable backups. Sometimes, our users will connect via mobile device and it will use their data to perform the backup. If they were able to enable and disable the backup, they would not have this issue."
"The recovery side, the restore side, could be a little more optimized."
"Having the licensing available for partners to be able to take advantage of testing without paying would make a big difference."
"The reporting feature and functionality need improvement. We would like to see a little bit more detailed reporting that offers more CEO or C-level focused reporting options."
"We don't use the solution’s automated recovery testing because SolarWinds made me cross. When they released it, I went, "Oh, well, that's quite good." Because if you use the system, then it supposedly spins up, and on the portal, it gives you a screenshot of the booted device. So, I phoned up, and I said, "Oh, that's really quite cool. How much is that?" They said, "No, no, no. It's all included in your license." I went, "Okay then," and went and deployed it on about half the fleet. One of the options that our customers have is they can pay us a small amount every month for us to test the recovery just to prove that it's viable, and I thought, "Well, this will do that for us. Nice." Then, in the next invoice, we got a charge for it. While It was not a huge amount, I took offense at the fact that we were told that it would be a no extra cost option that was part of our license, but it turns out that it's chargeable. Therefore, we haven't used it since."
"An area for improvement that would really work out well would be if there were a little bit more of an elegant handshake relationship between SolarWinds RMM and the PCs that are being backed up, to advise regarding "up" status... Since RMM is an agent that feeds back that a machine is alive and on, I don't see any reason why they can't either tap into that one feature or build the same exact polling within the backup agent, to update right away and say the system is online or offline."
"A feature I'd like to see would be a more customizable admin console."
Barracuda Intronis Backup is ranked 5th in MSP Backup with 24 reviews while N-able Cove Data Protection is ranked 1st in MSP Backup with 20 reviews. Barracuda Intronis Backup is rated 8.4, while N-able Cove Data Protection is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Barracuda Intronis Backup writes "Finding data to restore is much easier than rummaging through tapes to find backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able Cove Data Protection writes "Provides feature flexibility and modularity for our customers". Barracuda Intronis Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), whereas N-able Cove Data Protection is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Veeam Backup & Replication, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and MSP360 Backup. See our Barracuda Intronis Backup vs. N-able Cove Data Protection report.
See our list of best MSP Backup vendors.
We monitor all MSP Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.