We performed a comparison between Barracuda SSL VPN and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The setup is straightforward and hassle-free."
"The product is easy to connect."
"The most valuable feature would be that you can actually narrow down your session to one application on one server, which is really nice."
"It's a stand alone system that functions well."
"Setting policies allow, block, and limit users' access."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"The solution implemented in the cloud allows us to easily scale in cases of user increase."
"We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway."
"The solution has been solid for me for over five years."
"The most important feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is the multiple factor authentication."
"It offers a simple configuration and setup."
"The solution is easy to install, centrally managed, and stable, with good technical support and a straightforward setup."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Barracuda should find other ways to stir up interest about this product."
"Since it's not going to be getting any more software updates as per the end of this year, we have to move off to a different product.."
"There could be more security features included in the product."
"Reporting could be improved."
"The product’s architecture is a bit distributed."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"We would like to implement HTML5 (clientless access) in the product without installing any additional software."
"The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately."
"The ability to allow split-tunneling while still following our corporate policy needs to be on the table."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"The cost of maintenance is high compared to most products in the market."
"The Linux version may have an app (similar to Windows) instead of a shell script."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Barracuda SSL VPN is ranked 20th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 4 reviews while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews. Barracuda SSL VPN is rated 8.2, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Barracuda SSL VPN writes "Provides good scalability and has a simple setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". Barracuda SSL VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
