• Home
  • Bazel vs. GNU Make

Bazel vs GNU Make comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bazel Logo

Bazel

691 views|655 comparisons
GNU Logo

GNU Make

Read 5 GNU Make reviews
226 views|183 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bazel and GNU Make based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Bazel?
Anonymous User
Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as needed
GNU Make is such an essential tool that it is almost impossible to imagine working without it. Not having it, developers would probably have to... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is no price for this product. No licensing. It’s open-source."
  • "GNU Make is free and open source software."

    • More GNU Make Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    18th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    691
    Comparisons
    655
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    26th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    226
    Comparisons
    183
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Nx logo
    Nx vs. Bazel
    Compared 39% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Jenkins vs. Bazel
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Incredibuild logo
    Incredibuild vs. Bazel
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Tekton vs. Bazel
    Compared 6% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    GitLab vs. Bazel
    Compared 5% of the time.
    More Bazel Competitors   →
    Jenkins logo
    Jenkins vs. GNU Make
    Compared 68% of the time.
    More GNU Make Competitors   →
    Learn More
    Bazel
    Video Not Available
    GNU
    Overview

    From startup to enterprise, choose the Bazel open source project to build and test your multi-language, multi-platform projects.

    Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bazel is ranked 18th in Build Automation while GNU Make is ranked 26th in Build Automation. Bazel is rated 0.0, while GNU Make is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of GNU Make writes "Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as needed". Bazel is most compared with Nx, Jenkins, Incredibuild, Tekton and GitLab, whereas GNU Make is most compared with Jenkins.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.