We performed a comparison between Bitbar and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira."
"To me, what stands out the most about Tricentis Tosca is that even if I'm not a technical tester, I could pick up on how to use it very quickly because of the mechanisms of the tool, for example, its scanning mechanism. I'm not so technical, but I'm able to maneuver through Tricentis Tosca and derive capability. It's a user-friendly tool. It's not very complex."
"The automation engine is very strong, and it is very competitive in the market in terms of features. They develop a lot of features."
"Software testing tool that has multiple features. It's good to use for SAP testing, and it helps reduce test execution time."
"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."
"I am impressed with the product's script test."
"Tosca BI is important to make sure that our data integrity is in check and validated; to make sure our data is good. Our data is the number-one important driver for our company, so if that's not good, we have some big problems."
"The scalability is a valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."
"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."
"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."
"Tricentis Tosca currently does not support any mobile testing and can be improved."
"It requires some coding customization that requires expertise."
"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
"The Test Management options are still weak - improvement is outlined, but not yet visible. I"
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 96 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting and LambdaTest, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
