We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone XDR and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Wazuh and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)."The most valuable feature is the network security."
"The incident threat response and its ability to facilitate effective remediation against threats are the standout features."
"We can use Defender to block and monitor for security purposes without needing multiple other products to do different tasks."
"Microsoft 365 Defender is simple to upgrade."
"I have found the ability to delete unwanted threats beneficial."
"The integration between all the Defender products is the most valuable feature."
"The ability to integrate and observe a more cohesive narrative across the products is crucial."
"It's a very scalable tool that can be used in a very small environment or in a very large environment. Everything can be managed from a simple dashboard and can be scaled up or down depending on the customer's environment."
"Scalability is pretty easy. It's easy to increase the capacity. You can just add on licenses to the existing license, and the duration of the license can be adjusted. For example, you've already bought a license for a year, and you want to add some more users. We can just add on licenses for the remaining period so that the entire organization can have the same expiry date. That makes renewal easier."
"The log monitoring and analysis tools are great in addition to SIEM file activity monitoring."
"If they support a solution, it is easy to do an integration."
"The deployment is easy and they provide very good documentation."
"Wazuh is simple to use for PCI compliance."
"Wazuh offers numerous features, such as the ability to define custom rules for detecting malicious activities and remembering behaviors."
"Good for monitoring, active response, and for vulnerabilities."
"It has efficient SCA capabilities."
"Wazuh offers an enhanced HDR version that outperforms its competitors."
"While the XDR platform offers valuable functionalities, it falls short of other solutions in its ability to deliver a cohesive identity experience."
"The dashboard should be easier to use. There is also improvement needed in the reporting when it comes to exporting or scheduling reports."
"From an integration standpoint, it is always improving overall. With Security Copilot coming out, as partners, we are waiting for the GDAP support so that we can actually see Security Copilot on behalf of customers if they subscribe to it."
"A simple dashboard without having to use MS Sentinel would be a welcome improvement."
"For some scenarios, it provides good visibility into threats, and for some scenarios, it doesn't. For example, sometimes the URLs within the emails have destinations, and you do get a screenshot and all further details, but it's not always the case. It would be good if they did a better job of enabling that for all the emails that they identified as malicious. When you get an email threat, you can go into the email and see more details, but the URL destination feature doesn't always show you a screenshot of the URL in that email. It also doesn't always give you the characteristics relating to that URL. It would be quite good if the information is complete where it says that we identified this URL, and this is what it looks like. There should be some threat intel about it. It should give you more details."
"Intrusion detection and prevention would be great to have with 365 Defender."
"The message trace feature for investigating mail flow issues should add more detailed information to the summary report... if they could extend the summary report a little bit, make it more descriptive, ordinary administrators could understand what happened and that the emails failed at this or that point. That way they would know the location to go to try to correct it and to prevent it from occurring again."
"In the future, it would be beneficial for Microsoft to consider making the product more user-friendly or simplified for those who are interested in using it. Currently, it requires a high level of technical expertise, making it challenging for beginners or less experienced individuals."
"Another area of improvement is CPU utilization. CPU utilization could be improved."
"They could include flexibility and customization capabilities by modifying for customers based on partner agreements."
"The deployment is a bit complex."
"Scalability is a constraint in the on-prem version of Wazuh in terms of the volume of logs we can manage."
"Its user interface for sure can be improved. It is not so comfortable to use if you're looking for specific logs."
"The computing resources are consuming and do not make sense."
"The only challenge we faced with Wazuh was the lack of direct support."
"Wazuh should come up with more in-built rules and integrations for the cloud."
"Wazuh could improve the detection, it is not detecting all of the attacks. Additionally, it is lacking features compared to other solutions."
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is ranked 19th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 1 review while Wazuh is ranked 3rd in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 38 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is rated 9.0, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone XDR writes "Easy to use in terms of management and console is very user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is most compared with Trend Vision One and Microsoft Defender for Cloud, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, AlienVault OSSIM and USM Anywhere.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.