We performed a comparison between Bitwarden and CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Having all the passwords in one place is helpful."
"The product has a very friendly community."
"It is open source and the premium package is reasonable."
"In our organization, we use Bitwarden for managing product credentials. Bitwarden's collection feature enables us to securely create and store credentials, and we can easily provide team members with access to the relevant collections."
"Its integration capabilities and versatility, like the ability to securely save passwords and other critical information, make it incredibly useful."
"I've found something else that is extremely valuable. Bitwarden refers to it as "emergency access". It's essentially a digital legacy where you can assign approved users who can request access. If you don't decline within a certain timeframe, they can access it in case you're incapacitated or deceased. When I last checked, only a few services offered this feature. Bitwarden had the simplest and best implementation."
"CyberArk's GUI is user friendly."
"Our most valuable features would probably be key rotation, the SKM or SSH key manager, and account discovery."
"We use the solution for password vaulting, password rotation, session management, and secret management."
"The interface is very simple to use."
"It's highly secure and very flexible. It gives us all types of storage options and it gives us a high level of security."
"CyberArk has a lot of modules."
"Every aspect of the solution is very well integrated, and even that gives comfort. It is a fail-safe kind of environment."
"CPM helps keep the password policy up to date."
"The product could be cheaper."
"The product must be a bit more unified and refined."
"It would be ideal if the application could be seamlessly integrated into our open-source software, especially for the purpose of enabling straightforward logging."
"The solution should be made more secure as it has the banking sector and assets saved."
"I often use another password manager as well to keep my passwords separate, ensuring redundancy. But one simple thing Bitwarden could improve is providing an option to duplicate credentials. Often, you're creating many sets of credentials for the same thing. If they all have the same information, notes, login, collection, and naming - all you're changing is the password. The ability to duplicate credential records quickly would be a big win. It doesn't do that right now."
"Enhancing the tool by including additional security variables would be a valuable improvement."
"I would prefer that this is a fully-managed service, rather than have to manage the software ourselves and keep it up to date."
"The challenge with the product is pricing since it's expensive. It also needs to improve the customization. We encountered some stability issues as well."
"The initial setup could be simpler but it may not be as effective."
"The architecture needs to be improved."
"The technical support is very poor."
"CyberArk has two disadvantages; the first is that it's insanely expensive and the other is it's very complex."
"The tool's UI has bugs and lags. It needs to be improved. The deployment process can be complex due to multiple components for various functionalities, each requiring separate infrastructure management. To simplify this process, consolidating all these components into a single platform could be beneficial. The product's pricing could be cheaper."
"It is complicated to deploy for Windows servers compared to other vendors."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitwarden is ranked 8th in Enterprise Password Managers with 6 reviews while CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews. Bitwarden is rated 9.2, while CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bitwarden writes "Good Documentation, reliable, zero failure and fast ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". Bitwarden is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IronVest, AWS Secrets Manager and Zoho Vault, whereas CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server and 1Password. See our Bitwarden vs. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.