We compared Black Duck and JFrog Security Essentials based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
In summary, Black Duck excels in comprehensive code scanning and open-source software management, with positive customer service feedback. JFrog Security Essentials stands out for its outstanding customer support and advanced security features, with competitive pricing. However, Black Duck needs improvement in user interface and documentation, while JFrog should focus on UI and performance enhancements.
Features: Black Duck's valuable features include comprehensive code scanning, open source software management, real-time vulnerability alerts, customizable dashboards, and integration with development tools. JFrog Security Essentials offers comprehensive security, seamless integration, efficient vulnerability scanning, reliable artifact analysis, and proactive alert notifications.
Pricing and ROI: Black Duck's setup cost is intuitive and adaptable, with flexible pricing options. On the other hand, JFrog Security Essentials offers a straightforward and hassle-free setup cost, ensuring a smooth installation process with flexible licensing agreements., The ROI from Black Duck has been positive according to user feedback. Users found JFrog Security Essentials to be highly effective in enhancing security measures, mitigating risks, and safeguarding valuable assets.
Room for Improvement: Black Duck could benefit from improving the user interface, search functionality, performance, and documentation. JFrog Security Essentials needs enhancements for its user interface, performance, documentation, and additional features for a more robust security solution.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews suggest that there may be variations in the duration required for establishing a new tech solution, depending on the specific context. For Black Duck, one user spent three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while another user spent a week on both. As for JFrog Security Essentials, one user took three months for deployment and an extra week for setup, while another user took a week for both. These differences highlight the contrasting approaches to deployment and setup between Black Duck and JFrog Security Essentials., Black Duck's customer service receives positive feedback for their efficient assistance, responsiveness, and willingness to go above and beyond. JFrog Security Essentials excels in providing outstanding customer service with promptness, professionalism, and going the extra mile to resolve issues.
The summary above is based on 12 interviews we conducted recently with Black Duck and JFrog Security Essentials users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution is very good at scanning and evaluating open source software."
"The UI is the solution's most valuable feature since it allows for easy pipeline integration."
"The stability is okay."
"It is able to drill down to the source level."
"The solution works well on Mac products."
"The most valuable feature for me in Black Duck is its ability to scan binary files effectively."
"The product enables other applications to be secure."
"I like the fact that the product auto analyzes components."
"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Good reporting functionalities."
"The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."
"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."
"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."
"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."
"Due to the fact that, with our software developer life cycle, we don't need to scan our source code every day or every week. For that reason, we find the cost is too high. We might only actually use it five to ten times a year, which makes it expensive."
"It is a cloud-only solution. In many cases, companies like to evaluate the software, but they're very reluctant to give you the software. It would be great if they could offer an on-prem component that could be used to scan the code and then upload the discovery results to the cloud and get all the information from there, but there is no such possibility. You have to upload the code to the Black Duck cloud system. Of course, they have a strong legal department, and they offer some configuration, but it is never enough. You have to give the code, which is a drawback. In modern designs like Snyk or FOSSA, you don't need to give the code. It requires more native integration with Coverity because they go together technically. You need both Coverity and Black Duck Hub. It would be really helpful for companies working in this space to get a combined offer from the same company. They should provide an option to buy Coverity for an additional fee. Coverity combined with Black Duck Hub will provide a one-step analysis to get everything you need and a unified report. It would be really great to be able to connect Black Duck Hub with Coverity unified reports."
"The documentation is quite scattered."
"It needs to be more user-friendly for developers and in general, to ensure compliance."
"They are giving a lot of APIs and Python scripts for certain functionalities, but instead of using APIs and Python scripts, they should provide these functionalities through the UI. Users should be able to customize and add more fields through the UI. Users should be able to add more fields and generate reports. Currently, they are not giving flexibility in the UI. They're providing a script that simply generates an Excel file or CSV file. There is no flexibility."
"The tool needs to improve its pricing. Its configuration is complex and can be improved."
"We're not too sure about the extension of the firewall. It never shows up in the Hub."
"We have been having some issues with the latest releases where we are not able to scan our applications with the help of Black Duck."
"The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance."
"I think that the user interface should be expanded to provide customers with a better dashboard for reviewing their feedback regarding their images and the vulnerabilities that are associated with the images."
"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."
"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."
"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."
"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."
"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."
Black Duck is ranked 1st in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 19 reviews while JFrog Xray is ranked 7th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 7 reviews. Black Duck is rated 7.8, while JFrog Xray is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Black Duck writes "Enables applications to be secure, but it must provide more open APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Xray writes "An intelligent solution that prioritizes which vulnerability to target first in your project". Black Duck is most compared with Snyk, Fortify Static Code Analyzer, Mend.io, FOSSA and Sonatype Lifecycle, whereas JFrog Xray is most compared with Snyk, Veracode, Mend.io, Trivy and Fortify Static Code Analyzer. See our Black Duck vs. JFrog Xray report.
See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.
We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.