We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter and OpenText Silk Performer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools."It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to run high loads and generate reports."
"The stability is good."
"They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."
"I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The baseline comparison in BlazeMeter is very easy, especially considering the different tests that users can easily compare."
"The solution offers flexibility with its configurations."
"A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"Integration is one of the things lacking in BlazeMeter compared to some newer options."
"If the solution had better support and the documentation was efficient it would do better in the market."
"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."
"Having more options for customization would be helpful."
"For a new user of BlazeMeter, it might be difficult to understand it from a programming perspective."
"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."
"Potential areas for improvement could include pricing, configuration, setup, and addressing certain limitations."
"The reporting capabilities could be improved."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
BlazeMeter is ranked 4th in Load Testing Tools with 41 reviews while OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review. BlazeMeter is rated 8.2, while OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Reduced our test operating costs, provides quick feedback, and helps us understand how to build better test cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and BrowserStack, whereas OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Apache JMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.