We performed a comparison between BlueCat Edge and Cisco Umbrella based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Domain Name System (DNS) Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We implemented BlueCat Edge to solve the visibility and security issues we were having."
"IP Address Management (IPAM) is the most valuable."
"It allows us to easily monitor our subnets and routers."
"What I found most valuable is the ability to put it in place and integrate it very quickly. It allows us to create routing rule sets to route DNS traffic where it needs to go most efficiently in our environment."
"Web proxy adds an effective layer for security."
"They have a wealth of articles in their knowledge base. This has given me the freedom to troubleshoot on my own time. "
"One valuable feature is definitely its simplicity in terms of deployment. It is very easy to integrate it into the environment without any heavy lifting. Users didn't notice that we implemented it. You can start with a very low monitoring mode and start observing what Cisco Umbrella sees."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its reliability."
"Helps block personal email accounts."
"The user interface is great. It's very easy to tailor to our client's environment and needs."
"We can have a full overview and a quick overview of all the DNS requests. For us, it's quite important."
"It is user-friendly. It is easy to manage the solution."
"Its price is on the higher side."
"A more graphical user interface would be a benefit."
"I have concerns about several aspects of BlueCat's site management."
"One pain point concerning DNS Edge is the inability to see per Edge endpoint, what devices are querying against it. They do have the capability for you to look at that data, but the data is roughly 24 to 48 hours old. I am looking for real-time data, and I cannot get that per Edge endpoint."
"With any Cisco product, it's the licensing side of things that needs improvement."
"It would be better if there was a little bit of flexibility for organizations that don't have SD One in their environment. Because of the complexity of the environment, it's not easy to actually turn on the feature of the secure internet gateway for our users. We have not been able to explore that option yet."
"The solution's technical support is not very good."
"The product can be pretty expensive."
"Its on-prem rollout is quite challenging. It needs better coordination with the Internet Service Provider. It is a cloud-based solution, and any endpoint that connects to it has to go through all the gateway ISPs, but some of the ISPs block HTTPS-based DNS. That's where the challenge occurs with Umbrella."
"Something on our end that might make it better is alerting going to our ticketing system. It's not something that we have discussed, but that would be a proactive option for us to provide a learning experience for the staff."
"I would like to have more applications being recorded."
"If the security issues are taken care of it would be better."
BlueCat Edge is ranked 7th in Domain Name System (DNS) Security with 4 reviews while Cisco Umbrella is ranked 1st in Domain Name System (DNS) Security with 108 reviews. BlueCat Edge is rated 8.0, while Cisco Umbrella is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of BlueCat Edge writes "Invaluable at detecting DNS threats, improving performance, and reducing operational expenses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Umbrella writes "Protects endpoints wherever they are, always pushing people to the right locations to avoid malicious intent". BlueCat Edge is most compared with EfficientIP DNS Blast, F5 BIG-IP DNS, EfficientIP DNS Firewall and Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection, whereas Cisco Umbrella is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security and Fortinet FortiGate SWG. See our BlueCat Edge vs. Cisco Umbrella report.
See our list of best Domain Name System (DNS) Security vendors.
We monitor all Domain Name System (DNS) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.