We performed a comparison between BlueCat Integrity and Micetro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Infoblox, BlueCat, Nokia and others in DDI."This inherent stability, derived from its Linux-based architecture, provides a well-established and reliable platform."
"The most valuable features are scalability and cloud infrastructure."
"One of the key features enabling us to operate at our current scale is robust automation."
"DNS aliases, which we use extensively in our applications are a valuable feature."
"Adaptive DNS's best feature is DDoS protection, which stops malware and network security attacks."
"The solution includes automatic management of segments."
"The most valuable feature is the IPAMs, which provide visibility into all the IP addresses on the network."
"One of the better things about Integrity is that the underlying code it uses is an ISC DNS and DHCP. It's not like some of the other vendors that have created their own version of DNS."
"The maturity of the OS helps with the stability."
"One crucial area for development is IPv6 support."
"The technical support is slow and has room for improvement."
"Adaptive DNS only supports AWS for network automation and cloud computing and would be improved if it also supported other options like Azure or Google Cloud."
"The solution does not export reports in a comprehensive format."
"The DNS and DHCP servers for guests are separated from the main organization. A lot of times, it doesn't allow you to choose a default IP space. When I log in to the GUI, it doesn't default to where I want it to be. So far, I haven't been able to find out how to change or specify that so that it defaults to a particular space, such as the main org. If I'm looking for the IP space for guests, I need to toggle and go to the guest site. Most of the time, I want the IP space for the org to be my main space, but it doesn't give me the ability to do that, or I haven't been able to find that over the last two years."
"However, it does not offer robust support for high availability failover with different subnets, especially if the servers are located in different data centers and belong to distinct IP networks."
"The ease of use is where I got to give a little knock on them. Once you start using the tool, it becomes very easy. It's actually quite easy to use. The problem that I run into is documentation. The documentation could be a little bit richer. Documentation has always been a little pet peeve for me with them."
"Usability needs to be better."
"One area for improvement in RHEL is compatibility with some third-party tools, like those offered by Intel."
BlueCat Integrity is ranked 2nd in DDI with 15 reviews while Micetro is ranked 5th in DDI with 1 review. BlueCat Integrity is rated 8.8, while Micetro is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BlueCat Integrity writes "Helps reduce downtime, is easy to use, and frees up staff time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micetro writes "Provides robust security, comprehensive support, and an extended lifecycle". BlueCat Integrity is most compared with Infoblox DDI, Infoblox IPAM, SolarWinds IPAM and Cloudflare DNS, whereas Micetro is most compared with Infoblox IPAM and SolarWinds IPAM.
See our list of best DDI vendors.
We monitor all DDI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.