We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."
"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."
"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."
"How simple it is to create new solutions."
"The product is very stable."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
