We performed a comparison between Broadcom Control Compliance Suite and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance."I find the vulnerability assessment and asset prioritization feature valuable."
"I like how Archer requires very little programming ability. A person with minimum coding experience can configure the necessary fields in Archer. It's more of a drag-and-drop solution."
"RSA is a very rich application. I like its adaptive suggestion, where based on your users and the class of data, it can actually recommend you the proper control to choose. For example, we have been using PCI DSS as an NIST. So based on application feedback, it will provide you with a suggestion on which control objective needs to be set. Based on that, you can make a decision—you don't need to take the suggestion, but you can customize that particular provided suggestion. RSA Archer's workflow is also good, in terms of process automation."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"It has the best workload management features."
"RSA Archer is a good tool and I have found performing the application, ISMS, and TPRM assessments beneficial."
"The most valuable part of the product is the ease-of-use and the opportunity to create custom security applications easily."
"One of the useful features is the ability to connect to various systems in order to accommodate data."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"The support mechanism can be improved."
"In a future release, there should be an option to upload the main data."
"RSA Archer might be a bit expensive for small companies because it's a vast tool."
"In terms of what can be improved, our client always says their user experience, IU/UX in RSA Archer. They found it is not as user friendly as other tools."
"The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you have to scroll or type elsewhere and copy-paste it. It's very inconvenient."
"The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."
"I would like to see real-time data, from vulnerabilities, and threats."
More Broadcom Control Compliance Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is ranked 8th in IT Governance while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in IT Governance with 38 reviews. Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Control Compliance Suite writes "A good security tool for vulnerability assessment and asset prioritization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard.
See our list of best IT Governance vendors.
We monitor all IT Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.