We performed a comparison between Broadcom Service Virtualization and Orchestrated Service Virtualization based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization."The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services."
"The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET."
"The innovation is amazing. CA has continued to add to services that it supports, the transports that it supports, and has built all of the enterprise capabilities into the product as well."
"You can create virtual services from a live recording or convert raw traffic into request/response pairs."
"CA Service Virtualization has helped us advance the development cycle when third-party interfaces are not available to us."
"You can have a lot of different people with different technologies use the tool, without any programming experience at all, all the way up to people who can program. And then, the more technical that you are, the more programming you have, the more you're able to customize the tool."
"Scalability has actually worked well and we are able to bring it to multiple environments."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"You can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data."
"From a reporting perspective I think we would like to have a more user-friendly approach."
"More examples of portal-based virtualization."
"CA actually releases a new version every year. We had issues with the upgrade prior to the latest one."
"UI should be more user friendly: better usability, more testing oriented."
"The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to support virtualization for performance testing. This is a costly component."
"Needs some additional lightweight, portable elements."
"One major feature I would like to see is on the user administration part. Right now, anybody can access any of the folders and any of the projects."
"The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift."
"The initial setup was complex."
More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Orchestrated Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 97 reviews while Orchestrated Service Virtualization is ranked 6th in Service Virtualization. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while Orchestrated Service Virtualization is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Feature-rich, easy to configure and set up, and the support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Orchestrated Service Virtualization writes "Live connectivity benefits but is lacking customization options". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with ReadyAPI Test, Parasoft Virtualize, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server, OpenText Service Virtualization and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Orchestrated Service Virtualization is most compared with ReadyAPI Virtualization.
See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
