We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the automation and information that it provides in the reports."
"The most valuable feature for me is the Jenkins Plugin."
"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."
"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."
"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The features and technologies are very good. The flexibility and the roadmap have also been very good. They're at the forefront of delivering the additional capabilities that are required with cloud delivery, etc. Their ability to deliver what customers require and when they require is very important."
"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite does not hamper the node of the server, and it does not shut down the server if it is running."
"The most valuable features are Burp Intruder and Burp Scanner."
"It was easy to learn."
"The way they do the research and they keep their profile up to date is great. They identify vulnerabilities and update them immediately."
"I am impressed with the tool's detailed analysis for penetration testing. AppScan can give only visibility, but it can't do the PT part. But the PortSwigger Burp Application can do both, and it gives much more visibility on the PT rating."
"I have found this solution has more plugins than other competitors which is a benefit. You are able to attach different plugins to the security scan to add features. For example, you can check to see if there are any payment systems that exist on a server, or username and password brute force analysis."
"It's good testing software."
"There is no other tool like it. I like the intuitiveness and the plugins that are available."
"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."
"Licensing models and Swift language support are the aspects in which this product needs to improve. Swift is a new language, in which major customers require support for lower prices."
"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."
"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."
"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."
"If your application uses multi-factor authentication, registration management cannot be automated."
"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."
"In the Professional version, we cannot link it with the CI/CD process."
"The use of system memory is an area that can be improved because it uses a lot."
"The solution lacks sufficient stability."
"The Iran market does not have after-sales support. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional needs to provide after-sales support."
"Mitigating the issues and low confluence issues needs some improvement. Implementing demand with the ChatGPT under the web solution is an additional feature I would like to see in the next release."
"The biggest improvement that I would like to see from PortSwigger that today many people see as an issue in their testing. There might be a feature which might be desired."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 55 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix, HCL AppScan and Rapid7 InsightAppSec. See our Checkmarx One vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.