We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"When we log in to the device, we can easily configure it. So it is quite user-friendly."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is scalable. The XV2 model of the solution can support up to 216 people at a time."
"It is easy to deploy, and it is not that complicated. There are a lot of systems that are very complicated, and they require a special kind of training. Their response is also very slow, especially with the Chinese vendors, but with Cambium, we have not faced any issues. Everything is going well in terms of cooperation from Cambium. We are happy with them, their services, their cooperation, and their quick response. They are just amazing."
"The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"We used everything Cisco, not just wireless. It works great with other Cisco tools."
"The ease of management is the solution's most valuable feature."
"I also like that now you can add a cellular connection to the Cisco router. So, if your operator is down, you can now still have one connection in the office with the cellular module."
"I like how the look and feel of the product is standardized to match other Cisco solutions."
"It's a reliable solution."
"Cisco Wireless access points are highly stable with a wide coverage area."
"I like that it has integrated the cost of our network access."
"This stability is one of the major reasons to stick with this product."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The installation is difficult."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"I think this product could be improved if It were SMS based. If I have a visitor in my office, I'd like to be able to send them the wireless password as a message via SMS, so I don't have to give it out."
"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"Cisco Firewall cannot recognize some applications and that makes dealing with policies difficult. Even when we whitelist, it does not work well."
"There are a number of areas for improvement in Cisco Wireless WAN, including sensitive applications which face issues on wireless stuff and difficulty troubleshooting."
"I hope Cisco can improve the capacity to service a high density of users in a small area, as currently we have difficulties with this."
"The tool's speed and IP address acquisition from the domain controller should be improved"
"The network management system is not great."
"We did have issues with the product that made us concerned about the overall stability."
"A lot of the time, for users, it comes down to pricing. Many would like to see it be a bit less costly."
"The only disadvantage of Cisco is maybe the cost."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 23 reviews while Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cisco Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.