We performed a comparison between Cassandra and MarkLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"The technical evaluation is very good."
"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."
"A consistent solution."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."
"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."
"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."
"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."
"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."
"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."
"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."
"Cassandra could be more user-friendly like MongoDB."
"The solution is limited to a linear performance."
"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."
"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while MarkLogic is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while MarkLogic is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MarkLogic writes "Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, InfluxDB, ScyllaDB and Oracle NoSQL, whereas MarkLogic is most compared with MongoDB. See our Cassandra vs. MarkLogic report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
