We performed a comparison between Fortify on Demand and Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The vulnerability detection and scanning are awesome features."
"Fortify on Demand's best feature is that there's no need to install and configure it locally since it's on the cloud."
"Each bank may have its own core banking applications with proprietary support for different programming languages. This makes Fortify particularly relevant and advantageous in those cases."
"The solution saves us a lot of money. We're trying to reduce exposure and costs related to remediation."
"Audit workbench: for on-the-fly defect auditing."
"It is an extremely robust, scalable, and stable solution."
"There is not only one specific feature that we find valuable. The idea is to integrate the solution in DevSecOps which we were able to do."
"The licensing was good."
"The stability is great. We haven't had any issues at all with it."
"This solution would be improved if the code-quality perspective were added to it, on top of the security aspect."
"Reporting could be improved."
"Temenos's (T-24) info basic is a separate programming interface, and such proprietary platforms and programming interfaces were not easily supported by the out-of-the-box versions of Fortify."
"There are lots of limitations with code technology. It cannot scan .net properly either."
"In terms of what could be improved, we need more strategic analysis reports, not just for one specific application, but for the whole enterprise. In the next release, we need more reports and more analytic views for all the applications. There is no enterprise view in Fortify. I would like enterprise views and reports."
"If you have a continuous integration in place, for example, and you want it to run along with your build and you want it to be fast, you're not going to get it. It adds to your development time."
"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand can improve by having more graphs. For example, to show the improvement of the level of security."
".NET code scanning is still dependent on building the code base before running any scan. Also, it's dependent on an IDE such as Visual Studio."
"I would like to see a little more flexibility with regards to setting up profiles for vulnerabilities."
Earn 20 points
Fortify on Demand is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 56 reviews while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Tools. Fortify on Demand is rated 8.0, while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortify on Demand writes "Provides good depth of scanning but is unfortunately not fully integrated with CIT processes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] writes "It helps us troubleshoot failed scans and incomplete statuses". Fortify on Demand is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Veracode, Coverity and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.