We performed a comparison between Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The solution's most valuable aspect is that it can be fully integrated with Microsoft solutions and it doesn't impact the productivity order."
"It's the completeness of the solution that we like the most."
"Exporting is a good feature. It helps me out when I have to do reports. I do a lot of exporting and crunching of the numbers. Dashboards are okay for showing to the leadership, but for doing statistics and updating tickets, the export feature is very beneficial for me."
"It helps us uncover bottlenecks in the network."
"On the cloud, we are pushing through less than half a petabyte of data. So far, it has been fairly stable because it runs on all the underlying AWS infrastructures."
"The visibility is amazing with easy dashboard creation."
"Splunk has facilitated the correlation of information security logs to look for incidents which could cause damage to the company's infrastructure, as well as financial losses from leaks."
"Splunk's schema on demand is incredibly useful. I do not have to worry about what my users will need when we onboard their data."
"You can check up on security from the dashboards."
"The pricing could be improved. It needs to be reduced."
"Splunk ES could have more pre-built integrations and rules. The detection is fairly accurate, but it depends on the rules you create. Splunk's out-of-the-box configuration isn't that useful."
"Splunk could be improved by reducing the cost. The cost is one of the biggest challenges for us in keeping to our production requirements."
"An improved user interface along with multi-tenancy support would be beneficial."
"The analytics of Splunk could be improved."
"Custom visualizations are real hard. While the default visualizations are good, creating enhanced visualizations are complex."
"The product was difficult to back up the first time."
"I would like Splunk to add more integration. QRadar has many indications with more products than Splunk."
"It works as intended for us, and we are getting everything that we need out of it. If anything, its initial setup can be improved a bit."
More Change Auditor for Windows File Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is ranked 55th in Log Management while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 228 reviews. Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is rated 0.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Change Auditor for Windows File Servers writes "Good scalability, easy initial setup, and fully integrates with Microsoft solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is most compared with Quest InTrust, Wazuh and IBM Security QRadar, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
