We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and SUSE NeuVector based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management provides robust data security measures, incident detection, and detailed reporting. It offers IAM role control, training features, and governance support. On the other hand, SUSE NeuVector stands out for its user-friendly interface and automation. NeuVector seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines and supports ISO certification checks. Check Point CloudGuard could be more customizable and improve its vulnerability. NeuVector needs improvements in monitoring, reporting, and hybrid environment integration.
Service and Support: Customers generally have positive experiences with Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management's customer service, citing quick response times and good support. However, some say technical support needs improvement. In contrast, SUSE NeuVector is praised for its helpful and responsive support, although the process can sometimes be complicated.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is quick and easy, typically taking only a few minutes. On the other hand, the setup for SUSE NeuVector can be more challenging, with varying levels of difficulty reported by users. Some users find it easy, while others find it complex. One specific challenge with NeuVector is integrating it with pipelines.
Pricing: Some users consider Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management affordable, while others say the licensing model is a barrier to scaling and suggest a more flexible licensing model. While some SUSE NeuVector users say the price is low, others believe there is room for improvement.
ROI: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management provides effective cloud management, streamlines compliance, and decreases administrative workload, resulting in a notable return on investment. SUSE NeuVector is particularly advantageous for industries with significant risk and exposure, but other sectors like retail might not see the same return.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management over SUSE NeuVector. It is highly regarded for its strong data protection and comprehensive coverage of cloud infrastructure. Users appreciate its intuitive dashboard and powerful reporting capabilities. SUSE NeuVector users say the initial setup is a chore and the solution offers limited support for scanning IaaS and virtual machines.
"The identification of misconfigurations, maintenance of compliance in a centralized way, and visibility across all the multi-cloud tenants are the key functionalities."
"It offers security insights and recommendations to assist organizations in acting and remediating issues swiftly."
"The CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence tool has several significant features that provide security to our company."
"The tool is also very intuitive; its dashboards are very complete and provide a lot of valuable information for decision-making to improve security."
"The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to apply common tools across all accounts."
"We really liked its ease of implementation against our Microsoft Azure environment."
"The way they offer container security is a big highlight that I have noticed. The solution is also agentless, so the scanning, runtime, really everything is offered directly by CloudGuard."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"You do need to pay extra in order to get better support."
"I would like them to include support for their products in languages other than English."
"It should have some options to activate API calls to the platform in the cloud, another improvement would be that when the rules are colonized and they want to be published."
"No improvements are needed."
"One feature of the product that I would like to enhance is the possibility to connect to vulnerability management platforms so that the issues that emerge from the scans can then be ingested directly into the vulnerability management process."
"The Check Point solution is somewhat expensive."
"There are opportunities for improvement that can be addressed through a roadmap."
"The main issue that we found with Dome9 is that we have a default rule set with better recommendations that we want to use. So, you do a clone of that rule set, then you do some tweaks and customizations, but there is a problem. When they activate the default rule set with the recommendations and new security measures, it doesn't apply the new security measures to your clones profile. Therefore, you need to clone the profile again. We are already writing a report to Check Point."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 63 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 15th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 7 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Sysdig Falco and Sysdig Secure. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
