We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."
"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."
"The solution offers sophisticated security techniques with unique characteristics that can be particularly valuable for the financial sector, which is where we develop apps."
"The solution's strongest point is that you can connect everything to it, giving you a full view of what's connected."
"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."
"Its ability to adapt to our applications and ensure our security policies are followed is a big plus."
"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."
"Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI."
"The most valuable function is its usability."
"I like that it covers most programming languages for source code review."
"The solution has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages."
"The good thing with SonarQube is it covers a lot of issues, it's a very robust framework."
"SonarQube is useful for controlling all of our Azure task tracking and scanning."
"The code coverage feature is very good."
"It has very good scalability and stability."
"There are many options and examples available in the tool that help us fix the issues it shows us."
"You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so."
"I feel like I need more clarity in understanding pricing for DDoS protection."
"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."
"One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support."
"The coding configurations can be simplified to save time for IT teams and developers."
"It doesn't detect user activity like some of its competitors. It's not a vulnerability, but it's a legitimate activity that it doesn't detect. It only detects vulnerabilities or misconfigurations."
"CloudGuard could improve in areas such as ease of integration with Fortinet and reducing costs associated with deployment in cloud environments like Azure."
"They should improve in the delivery of more detailed reports with more information."
"The product must improve security analysis."
"The interface could be a little better and should be enhanced."
"A robust credential scanner would be a huge bonus as it would remove the need for yet another niche product."
"We found a solution with dynamic testing, and are looking to find a solution that can be used for both types of testing."
"I find it is light on the security side."
"An improvement is with false positives. Sometimes the tool can say there is an issue in your code but, really, you have to do things in a certain way due to external dependencies, and I think it's very hard to indicate this is the case."
"The pricing could be reduced a bit. It's a little expensive."
"When we have a thousand products published over it, we expect it to be more efficient in terms of serving requests from the browser."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 12th in Application Security Tools with 28 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 108 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 8.8, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with Checkmarx One, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. SonarQube report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
