"The solution was easy to deploy and provided a useful security enhancement for mobile devices."
"With Harmony Mobile, we have been able to provide additional security to our network."
"The use and management of our portal is easy."
"Management can see all devices on one panel and easily highlight any devices under threat."
"We like the URL content filtering, that is one of the most valuable features."
"One of the features that have given us additional value is being able to encrypt and block how data is shared within cell phones or mobile devices."
"The most impressive thing is the SSL VPN Portal."
"The best thing about the product is that it is transparent and does not impact the users."
"What I like most about FortiClient is that it's easy to use. The way it displays information is very straightforward."
"Fortinet FortiClient offers a vulnerability test feature, allowing us to monitor end-user devices. This includes ensuring necessary updates, such as Windows updates, are not overlooked."
"This is a solid and stable solution."
"It is a scalable product."
"The configuration is the most valuable feature."
"FortiClient is very easy, useful, and practical."
"The Fortinet FortiClient is simple to use."
"The most valuable feature is the single pane of glass, single point of management."
"Harmony Mobile could be improved with increased built-in DLP coverage."
"From a user's perspective, of course, it is always better when it is cheaper in price."
"The product does not provide deep capabilities for sharing specific data to users or groups separately, nor does it provide visibility as to whether a user has access to the data or not."
"The admin portal is slightly clunky and sometimes shows a different status than what the device is actually doing."
"One thing that should be improved in the future of the ability to ensure that mobile devices are protected from connections in environments with unlimited connectivity."
"There could be more automation features for the solution."
"While it's great, there's always room for improvement. Adding capabilities for automatic deployment in an enterprise environment would be useful."
"I think that the pricing for the Check Point products should be reconsidered, as we found it to be quite expensive to purchase and to maintain."
"It has a horrible performance. It is one of the most unstable VPNs I have ever used."
"The solution's access control could be improved."
"With the lower-end licenses, it tends to kick you out after eight hours. There is a function where it automatically kicks you out after eight hours. They could improve that and not kick you out after eight hours. Other than that, it is already pretty good."
"I would like Fortinet to improve FortiClient's compatibility with macOS."
"There isn't much to improve in terms of features and comparison with other vendors. It just needs to stay more up to date in catching the malware. The user interface may be improved, which would be a minor enhancement. Unlike central management, in endpoint security, the end users don't need to keep looking at the endpoint user interface. The technology is the most important thing in endpoint security."
"In terms of improvements, their SSL VPN tunnel can be a lot better. I've seen other products that have got much better VPN features than Fortinet. Some of my colleagues get this error called "License not available." When they get this error, they have to uninstall and reinstall it. This kind of problem is there, and sometimes, we have to open a case with Fortinet to resolve it. Their support is quick, so we are able to resolve and move forward. In terms of new features, when it is connecting, it should check the endpoint and say whether the end client is actually safe enough or whether there is a vulnerability. It should give a pop-up on the client itself. Because I'm on the admin side, I can also see this information in the log. However, if a non-IT user, such as a user from finance, is working on this and there is some problem, he or she would not know about this and would call IT admin to say that this is not working. If the users get a message explaining why and what is happening, it is easy for them to understand."
"More integration would be beneficial."
"I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly for users to do not have as much of a technical background."
Check Point Harmony Mobile is ranked 1st in Mobile Threat Defense with 44 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 15th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 85 reviews. Check Point Harmony Mobile is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Mobile writes "Easy to implement, simple to maintain policies, and does not disrupt end-user functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". Check Point Harmony Mobile is most compared with Check Point Remote Access VPN, Lookout, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, VMware Workspace ONE and Zimperium, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
We monitor all Mobile Threat Defense reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
