We performed a comparison between Check Point Infinity and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."The detection and reaction rates are good."
"It has come to reinforce the security architecture of the organization since it covers all the necessary pieces of security."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from factors like ease of use, visibility, and cost to the enterprise."
"The initial implementation was accomplished easily and without deployment problems."
"It is a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Infinity is the ease of use and navigation."
"For me, one of the best features of Check Point Infinity is to be able to have the possibility of emulating the activity of attached files with malicious content in such a short time."
"Powerful cyber security functionalities track workflows to block all threats that may arise and affect the workflow chain."
"It has the ability to scale out. We have scaled out quite a bit with our product and use of it to get to multiple locations and businesses, so it has the breadth to do that."
"The technical support is good."
"It has a centralized page where you can manage everything. This makes work easier. You don't have to remember different module URLs or browser applications. It is very easy to get all the secure identities of other environments into a single page, which is very important for us as it helps a lot in terms of operations, e.g., reduces management time. This is a single page where you can manage all accounts and onboard them to the CyberArk. You can then secure and see passwords from everywhere. So, there is a single pane of glass where you can manage all the identities across environments as well as across different types of identities."
"The voice technology is very good."
"You can easily manage more than 4000 accounts with one PSM."
"We are able to rotate privileged user passwords to eliminate fraudulent use."
"We've written over a hundred custom connectors ourselves that allow us to do all types of privileged session management for various applications. On top of that, the rest of the API-based central credential providers allow us to get away from credentials that may be hard-coded in the script or some application."
"PSM (Privilege Session Manager."
"The tool's technical support lags."
"We'd like to see support for fiber connections."
"In the future, I would like to see new developments that allow us to centralize the cloud."
"Check Point Infinity's web application is sometimes a little slow."
"Check Point Infinity price could improve."
"The console at the beginning also has the section on where to save the logs, however, if by mistake we choose a very remote area, this detail cannot be corrected unless the change of data center where the logs are housed, which is requested through support, which can become a management difficulty."
"There is an issue with high agent size, which impacts performance."
"Alert fatigue is a common issue with platforms that have strong detection capabilities. Implementing more filtering and prioritization mechanisms can help address this issue, ensuring that security teams can focus on the most critical threats."
"We would, of course, always prefer it if the pricing was cheaper."
"The initial setup was somewhat complex."
"There is a learning curve when it comes to planning out the deployment strategy, but once it is defined, it runs itself."
"CyberArk has a lot on the privileged access side but they have to concentrate more on the application side as well."
"We don't often contact technical support, but when we do it, the response could be faster and better."
"As a customer, I might need a plugin for a specific product, or an application, and CyberArk might have already worked with some other client on it. There has to be some platform where it is available for everybody else to go and grab it, instead of my having to reinvent the wheel."
"The current interface doesn't scale that well, and has some screens still in the old layout."
"The authentication port is available in CyberArk Alero but not Fortinet products."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Infinity is ranked 14th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 26 reviews while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews. Check Point Infinity is rated 8.8, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point Infinity writes "Provides robust cybersecurity with a comprehensive suite of features, expert support, and scalable cloud-based architecture, ensuring effective threat detection and continuous improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". Check Point Infinity is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Skybox Security Suite, Proofpoint Email Protection and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
