We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."From my point of view, it is the best product on the market."
"Apart from software scanning, software composition scanning is valuable."
"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."
"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."
"The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly."
"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."
"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."
"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."
"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."
"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."
"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in API Security with 67 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 8th in API Security. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare. See our Checkmarx One vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.
See our list of best API Security vendors.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
