We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Firewall and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgate, Fortinet, OPNsense and others in Firewalls."Security management tool that's easy to integrate and easy to work with. No issues found with its stability and scalability."
"The technical support is great."
"What I like the most is the configuration and that it's simple, and straightforward to maintain."
"The web tutor and automatic rules by schedule are good features."
"Fortinet FortiGate's most valuable features are ease of use, flexibility, and most of the configuration we can be done using the GUI. When we compare Fortinet FortiGate with other solutions the firewall policy are very easy to understand."
"The most valuable features are the enterprise modeling and the simple interface."
"The GUI is good."
"The UTM feature is quite good. FortiAP is easy to deploy because both Fortigate and FortiAP are under the same brand. Otherwise, you need to do more work on the configuration."
"The user interface, the UI, is excellent on the solution."
"The setup was straightforward. I was happy with the configuration and deployment of the solution, as it was quick."
"I like that it is easy to change the settings."
"The most valuable feature is the access control list (ACL)."
"Netting is one of the best features. We can modify it in different ways. Site-to-site VPN is also an awesome feature of Cisco ASA. The biggest advantage of Cisco products is technical support. They provide the best technical support."
"A good intrusion prevention system and filtering."
"For our very specific use case, for remote access for VPN, ASAs are very good."
"URL filtering is valuable."
"The installation phase was easy."
"The server appliance is good."
"Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security."
"The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security."
"Very functional and good for detecting malicious traffic."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."
"The most valuable feature is the view into the application."
"The monitor and the visibility, in this proxy, is very weak."
"The search tool needs improvement. It's very difficult to search for policies right now."
"Usually, we sell the bundle with the UTM or threat management piece with IPS, IDS. Other providers, such as Palo Alto, are ahead in terms of safe functionality. So, for me, delivering truly safe service is probably something that still needs to be improved."
"We had some issues in the beginning while setting it up, but after doing the firmware update, it is working fine."
"Some of the software stability could improve."
"The support system could be improved."
"The performance could be a bit better. Right now, I find it to be lacking. Having good performance is very important for our work."
"Lacks training for new features."
"I would like it to be easier to work with and have a better user interface. It is not straightforward. You need to know the Cisco command-line interface."
"One area that could be improved is its logging functionality. Your logs are usually displayed on the screen, but if you want to go back one or two days, then you need another solution in place because those logs are overwritten within minutes."
"Technical support takes a long time to respond."
"More intuitive support for SIP services are needed. This took a long time to configure properly for the user."
"Most of the time, when I try to run Java, it is not compatible with ASA's current operating systems."
"Report generation is an area that should be improved."
"Cisco ASDM is a problem because it is old."
"With the new FTD, there is a little bit of a learning curve."
"We'd like the potential for better scaling."
"Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."
"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right."
"FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically."
"Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization."
"Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier."
"If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."
"It is very expensive, the price could be better."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Secure Firewall is ranked 4th in Firewalls with 404 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 37 reviews. Cisco Secure Firewall is rated 8.2, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Firewall writes "Highlights and helps us catch Zero-day vulnerabilities traveling across our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one". Cisco Secure Firewall is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX, Sophos XG and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Vectra AI and Zabbix.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.