We performed a comparison between Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics and Cisco Secure Network Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)."The most valuable feature of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is its reliability."
"Cisco Stealthwatch has reduced the amount of time to detect an immediate threat."
"I believe this solution has reduced our incident response time."
"The feature most valuable for us is to gain visibility of what is actually floating through, so we can stop it based on whether it's good or bad traffic."
"The most valuable feature is NetFlow. The beginning of any security investigation starts with NetFlow data."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is the Threat Intelligence integration."
"Able to drill down into a center's utilization, then create reports based on it."
"It provides good visibility to the customers. People are still evaluating it, but it provides visibility and helps them to take action to remediate and mitigate the issues that are highlighted on the dashboard. It has good integration with the Cisco switching platform."
"It has improved our internal knowledge of what's going on with the network, and that's helpful."
"Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics could improve by having quicker detection and response and web analysis."
"The version with the Dell server had iDRAC problems. Often, it reported iDRAC failure."
"It is time-consuming to set it up and understand how the tool works."
"The customizability of the UI should improve."
"The initial setup is complex, as there is a lot to configure."
"The reporting of day-to-day metrics still has room for improvement."
"Reliance on Java. Get away from that."
"Stealthwatch is still maturing in AI. It uses artificial intelligence for predictions, but AI still needs to mature. It is in a phase where you get 95% correct detection. As its AI engine learns more, it will become more accurate. This is applicable to all the devices that are using AI because they support both supervised and unsupervised machine learning. The accuracy in the case of supervised machine learning is dependent on the data you feed into the box. The accuracy in the case of unsupervised machine learning is dependent on the algorithm. The algorithm matures depending on retrospective learning, and this is how it is able to detect zero-day attacks."
"The ability to be natively integrated into Port Aggregator would be beneficial because it would reduce just one more component that's needed in order to have that type of view."
More Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is ranked 23rd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 1 review while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 24th in Network Monitoring Software with 57 reviews. Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is rated 10.0, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics writes "Simple deployment, reliable, and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is most compared with , whereas Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.