We performed a comparison between Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SSL VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The most valuable features are that it's reliable, convenient, and easy. It always works if configured well."
"I like to work with the CMD command line because it's easy and it doesn't take very long to configure."
"The product is very stable."
"I have found that Cisco IOS SSL VPN is stable."
"The setup and installation was easy."
"It helps us access networks from anywhere."
"The solution is very reliable."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is reasonably priced, and its technology is flexible."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"The platform is easy to use."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"It would be nice if we could use this not just on mobile, but on laptops and desktops as well."
"The company sets the policies for the default location, and destination, which the VPN connects. If there is a problem with one of those locations, which happens sometimes when I travel I need to have an option to select a different available location. Currently, I am unable to see that from a user's point of view."
"The servers should be more user-friendly."
"I would like for it to have support for the Dutch language. I typically use English in 99% of our communications but for some people, it matters."
"Improvements could be made in terms of connectivity for applications."
"The pricing is a stumbling block to scaling our utilization of Cisco products and we would prefer to use more of them."
"The pricing needs to be better."
"When many people are using the internet at home, which is usually right after dinner, this type of service is a little bit hard to use. The internet becomes quite slow, and sometimes, I have to stop using this application. I am not sure if this issue is because of the application or my internet provider."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is ranked 1st in SSL VPN with 47 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 7th in SSL VPN with 5 reviews. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is rated 8.6, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco IOS SSL VPN writes "The solution is very stable and scalable, but it is expensive, and the configuration is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Zyxel VPN Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Ivanti Connect Secure and SonicWall Netextender, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, OpenVPN Access Server and AWS Direct Connect. See our Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
